2019
DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilizing the RE-AIM framework to understand adoption of nutrition policies at food pantries across the USA

Abstract: One in five food pantries had a formal nutrition policy, and informal nutrition policies existed for half of the food pantries that responded to the survey.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both phases, the minority of pantries had a written nutrition policy at preassessment and postassessment. This is in line with prior literature indicating that a minority of food pantries have formal written policies, 26,39,40 despite their perceived value by stakeholders. 41,42 In the current study, there was an increase in the adoption of nutrition policies after the provision of technical assistance, but it was only among a handful of pantries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In both phases, the minority of pantries had a written nutrition policy at preassessment and postassessment. This is in line with prior literature indicating that a minority of food pantries have formal written policies, 26,39,40 despite their perceived value by stakeholders. 41,42 In the current study, there was an increase in the adoption of nutrition policies after the provision of technical assistance, but it was only among a handful of pantries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…While some research exists on policy development among food banks, the literature on policy adoption among food pantries is sparse. One study found that 21% of US pantries have a formal nutrition policy and those pantries reported fewer barriers to offering healthy foods [ 41 ]. Other research identified characteristics associated with policy adoption, such as pantry size and the proportion of food purchased [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most implementation research in social service organizations has focused on mental health and addressing social and economic needs (e.g., employment, food security) (87). Implementation research about chronic disease prevention in these organizations has focused on tobacco control and cancer screening referral in community resource referral agencies (23,73,130); healthy eating and physical activity in home visiting programs focused on children's development (116,125); and improvement in opportunities for healthy eating through charitable food systems (57,138). These lines of diverse research suggest a growing recognition of the role these settings can play directly in preventing chronic disease and indirectly by addressing social determinants of health, as part of organizations' primary sets of services (87).…”
Section: Social Service Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particular EBPP chosen should match or be designed to align with the organization's operational characteristics, e.g., their usual interaction with individuals, their reporting and quality control mechanisms, and their financial and other reward systems. Organizations that have a shorter-term interaction with individuals, e.g., food pantries, may be better suited to deliver brief programs to individuals or implement organizational-level programs and policies to operations or structures in support of chronic disease prevention (57). Conversely, organizations that have a more frequent, long-term interaction with individuals, e.g., home visiting programs or mutual self-help programs, could feasibly deliver individual-level health interventions that are embedded into their usual programming (125).…”
Section: Social Service Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%