2022
DOI: 10.1177/15330338221131387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilizing the TractSeg Tool for Automatic Corticospinal Tract Segmentation in Patients With Brain Pathology

Abstract: Purpose: White-matter tract segmentation in patients with brain pathology can guide surgical planning and can be used for tissue integrity assessment. Recently, TractSeg was proposed for automatic tract segmentation in healthy subjects. The aim of this study was to assess the use of TractSeg for corticospinal-tract (CST) segmentation in a large cohort of patients with brain pathology and to evaluate its consistency in repeated measurements. Methods: A total of 649 diffusion-tensor-imaging scans were included, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TractSeg-based corticospinal tract segmentation was implemented in 28 patients with brain masses adjacent to or displacing the corticospinal tract, and the automated algorithm was able to segment the bilateral corticospinal tracts (CSTs) in all patients, whereas the manual fiber segmentation approach failed to reconstruct the CSTs in 2 patients (Richards et al 2021 ). In a large cohort ( N = 625) of patients with various brain pathologies, TractSeg showed superior consistency in CST segmentation compared with the manual approach (Moshe et al 2022 ). TractSeg was also able to perform fiber bundle segmentation in the presence of brain abnormalities, such as enlarged ventricles (Fig.…”
Section: Tractsegmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TractSeg-based corticospinal tract segmentation was implemented in 28 patients with brain masses adjacent to or displacing the corticospinal tract, and the automated algorithm was able to segment the bilateral corticospinal tracts (CSTs) in all patients, whereas the manual fiber segmentation approach failed to reconstruct the CSTs in 2 patients (Richards et al 2021 ). In a large cohort ( N = 625) of patients with various brain pathologies, TractSeg showed superior consistency in CST segmentation compared with the manual approach (Moshe et al 2022 ). TractSeg was also able to perform fiber bundle segmentation in the presence of brain abnormalities, such as enlarged ventricles (Fig.…”
Section: Tractsegmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TractSeg has also been qualitatively validated in a tumour dataset with mostly successful results, with more complete segmentations in cases with minimally displacing tumours (Richards et al, 2021 ). In Moshe et al ( 2022 ), the authors trained their own TractSeg model, on approximately 500 datasets, to segment the corticospinal tract (CST) in brain tumour patients. The results were more reproducible than for the compared manual method, and obtained an average dice similarity score of 0.64, almost 25% worse than the performance in healthy data reported in the original TractSeg study (for the same tract).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of analogous large open clinical datasets is preventing the training of the supervised learning model tailored for patients, where the white matter structures deviate from the normative model. Despite the occasional use of the models trained on healthy individuals for some small collection of patients [14,17,10,2,12], the translation of these models to clinical data remains an open challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%