DOI: 10.25148/etd.fi14110703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilizing Traditional Cognitive Measures of Academic Preparation to Predict First-Year Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Majors' Success in Math and Science Courses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through a thorough examination of the literature related to predicting student academic performance in STEM majors, three streams of research can be found. Several studies relied on cognitive factors such as; high school exam scores (De Winter and Dodou, 2011), HSGPA and admission test scores (Jiang and Freeman, 2011; Andrews, 2014) and scores on standardized tests such as the ACT and the SAT (Kauffmann et al , 2007; French et al , 2005). Though high school grades and other admission tests might be good predictors for first-year GPA, Ackerman et al (2013) argued that a great deal of individual difference variance remains unaccounted for.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through a thorough examination of the literature related to predicting student academic performance in STEM majors, three streams of research can be found. Several studies relied on cognitive factors such as; high school exam scores (De Winter and Dodou, 2011), HSGPA and admission test scores (Jiang and Freeman, 2011; Andrews, 2014) and scores on standardized tests such as the ACT and the SAT (Kauffmann et al , 2007; French et al , 2005). Though high school grades and other admission tests might be good predictors for first-year GPA, Ackerman et al (2013) argued that a great deal of individual difference variance remains unaccounted for.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of such studies have used the classical linear regression or other types of regression. These approaches include logistic regression (Lin and Imbrie, 2014), multiple linear regression (Ting and Man, 2001; Virtanen et al , 2013), hierarchical logistic regression (French et al , 2005; Andrews, 2014), hierarchical multiple regression (Whitaker, 2014) and multinomial logistic regression (Hall et al , 2015). Other statistical methods include path analysis (French et al , 2003) and correlational analysis (Bernadin and McKendrick, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%