2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-015-0779-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilizing water, mineralogy and sedimentary properties to predict LCPC abrasivity coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it should be noted that the WAMs of the porous ignimbrites excavated in CSC projects were determined by a simple test method in the present study. However, using the LCPC test, another widely used test method to assess the abrasivity of rocks and soils, similar results to the results obtained in this study were revealed by different researchers (Barzegari et al 2015;Hashemnejad et al 2016;Abu Bakar et al 2018). These studies have generally reported that the abrasivity of rocks or soils increases, especially at a given water content value, and that extra water added later can be beneficial to reduce rock abrasivity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, it should be noted that the WAMs of the porous ignimbrites excavated in CSC projects were determined by a simple test method in the present study. However, using the LCPC test, another widely used test method to assess the abrasivity of rocks and soils, similar results to the results obtained in this study were revealed by different researchers (Barzegari et al 2015;Hashemnejad et al 2016;Abu Bakar et al 2018). These studies have generally reported that the abrasivity of rocks or soils increases, especially at a given water content value, and that extra water added later can be beneficial to reduce rock abrasivity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Another widely used test method to determine the abrasivity of rocks is LCPC (Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées), which is defined by French standards (LCPC 1990). The relationships between the abrasivity and strength parameters of the different rock groups, each generally consisting of rocks with the same origin, were also investigated using the LCPC test results (Hashemnejad et al 2016;Kahraman et al 2018). Kahraman et al (2018) statistically analyzed the effects of rock strengths on the LCPC abrasivity coefficient (LAC) for igneous rocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, grains are classified into four groups: spherical, planar, needle-form, and blade form particles (Tucker, [24]). The shape index which proposed by Hashemnejad et al [25] as in Eq. ( 7), is the sum of length-to-width (L/W) and lengthto-thickness (L/T) ratios: Where, L, W, and T are the length, width, and thickness of each aggregate, respectively.…”
Section: Shape Index Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hashemnejad et al [25] proposed Eq. ( 8) to define effective (dominant) grain size for each soil: (8) Where, D 10 , D 30 , and D 60 are the diameters of grain size less than 10, 30, and 60%, respectively.…”
Section: Determination Of Effective Grain Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of tribology, the soil-tool tribological system consists of the soil, cutting tool, and contact interface between them (Mostafaei et al 2019). Soil parameters (mineralogical composition (Thuro and Kasling 2009;Köhler et al 2011;Rostami et al 2012;Lohne 2013, Jakobsen et al 2013a, b), particle size distribution (Thuro et al 2007;Thuro and Kasling 2009;Drucker 2011;Köhler et al 2011;Thakare et al 2012;Woldman et al 2012;Majeed and Bakar 2019;Mosleh et al 2019), grain shape (Hamblin and Stachowiak 1996;Stachowiak 2000;Stachowiak and Stachowiak 2001;Stachowiak 2002a, b, 2004;De Pellegrin et al 2009a;Hashemnejad et al 2012;Woldman et al 2012), compactness (Jakobsen and Lohne 2013) and water content (Rostami et al 2012;Alavi Gharahbagh et al 2013, 2014aJakobsen et al 2013b;Mosleh et al 2013;Hashemnejad et al 2016;Mirmehrabi et al 2016;Bakar et al 2018), etc. ), contact interface properties (Borio et al 2007;Vinai et al 2008;Peila et al 2012;Jakobsen et al 2013b;Alavi Gharahbagh et al 2014b;Rostami et al 2017), cutting tool material (Peila et al 2012;Rostami et al 2012;Mosleh et al 2013), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%