Utilizing X-ray computed tomography for heritage conservation: The case of Megalosaurus bucklandii

Wilson, Paul F.; Williams, Mark A.; Warnett, Jason M.; Attridge, Alex; Ketchum, Hilary F.; Hay, J. N.; Smith, M. Paul

doi:10.1109/i2mtc.2017.7969983

Cited by 10 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The μ-tomography allows to work on a small scale, ranging from sub-millimeters to a few centimeters, and with a spatial resolution of a few microns. These different techniques are more and more used for a wide range of CH material [40][41][42][43][44].…”

Section: Digitization and Data Processingmentioning

confidence: 99%

eXtended Reality for Cultural Heritage

Gaugne

Barreau

Lécuyer

et al. 2022

Handbook of Cultural Heritage Analysis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

3D data production techniques, although increasingly used by archaeologists and Cultural Heritage practitioners, are most often limited to the production of 2D or 3D images. Beyond the modes of visualization of these data, it is necessary to wonder about their possible interactions and uses. Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality, collectively known as eXtended Reality, XR, or Cross Reality, make it possible to envisage natural and/or complex interactions with 3D digital environments. These are physical, tangible, or haptic (i.e., with effort feedback) interactions, which can be understood through different modalities or metaphors, associated with procedures or gestures. These interactions can be integrated by archaeologists in the "operating chain" of an operation (from the ground to the study phase), or be part of a functional reconstitution of the procedures and gestures of the past, in order to help understand an object, a site, or even a human activity. The different case studies presented in this chapter result from collaborations between archaeologists, historians, and computer scientists. They illustrate different interactions in 3D environments, whether they are operational (support for excavation processes) or functional (archaeological objects, human activities of the past).

show abstract

Section: Digitization and Data Processingmentioning

confidence: 99%

eXtended Reality for Cultural Heritage

Gaugne

Barreau

Lécuyer

et al. 2022

Handbook of Cultural Heritage Analysis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Neuroscience research on learning also supports a connection between multisensory learning and memory encoding (Spence and Gallace, 2008;Lacey and Sathian, 2014;Ward, 2014;Reeve and Woollard, 2015). Implementations of 3D printed examples of multisensory experiences also seem to be successful although, but to date only simple investigations into user experience (Dima et al 2014;Marshall et al 2016) and recommendations of its use have emerged (Rahman et al 2012;Leakey and Dzamabova, 2013;Laycock et al 2015;Du Plessis et al 2015;Wilson et al 2017b). As yet, little is known about how useful 3D printed replicas are as pedagogical tools for museum learning and user experience and thus, investigation into how 3D printed replicas can enhance the learning experience of visitors is required.…”

Section: Further Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Museum visitor preference for the physical properties of 3D printed replicas

Wilson

Stott

Warnett

et al. 2018

Journal of Cultural Heritage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The geosciences have many applications from the study of porosity in rocks and grain analysis, to fluid flows therein [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Aside from gaining more information on an object it also allows for the digital preservation of specimens in natural history collections that can degrade over time [11][12][13][14][15]. Materials scientists are particularly interested in the response to loading, and use CT to study anything from damage and crack characterisation to fibre analysis in polymer composites [16][17][18][19][20].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of high-speed imaging with lab-based x-ray computed tomography

Zwanenburg

Williams

Warnett

2021

Meas. Sci. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

X-ray computed tomography (CT) is frequently used for non-destructive testing with many applications in a wide range of scientific research areas. The difference in imaging speeds between synchrotron and lab-based scanning has reduced as the capabilities of commercially available CT systems have improved, but there is still a need for faster lab-based CT both in industry and academia. In industry high-speed CT is desirable for inline high-throughput CT at a higher resolution than currently possible which would save both time and money. In academia it would allow for the imaging of faster phenomena, particularly dynamic in-situ testing, in a lab-based setting that is more accessible than synchrotron facilities. This review will specifically highlight what steps can be taken by general users to optimise scan speed with current equipment and the challenges to still overcome. A critical evaluation of acquisition parameters across recent high-speed studies by commercial machine users is presented, indicating some areas that could benefit from the methodology described. The greatest impacts can be achieved by maximising spot size without notably increasing unsharpness, and using a lower number of projections than suggested by the Nyquist criterion where the anecdotal evidence presented suggests usable results are still achievable.

show abstract

Utilizing X-ray computed tomography for heritage conservation: The case of Megalosaurus bucklandii

Cited by 10 publications

References 25 publications

eXtended Reality for Cultural Heritage

eXtended Reality for Cultural Heritage

Museum visitor preference for the physical properties of 3D printed replicas

Review of high-speed imaging with lab-based x-ray computed tomography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About