Utopian River Planning and Hydrosocial Territory Transformations in Colombia and Spain

Abstract

This paper examines how utopian river planning has arisen in Colombia and Spain since the late nineteenth century. Specifically, the paper contributes to understanding how particular ideologies of modernism and development present in territorial planning connect both countries. Taking Thomas More’s classic work ‘Utopia’ as the analytical reference, I analyze how utopian tendencies have traveled through time and space to shape territorial planning and water governance. In both countries, this was evident in the late nineteenth century through the political project to strengthen the nation state. For Spain, I describe the regenerationist movement and the hydraulic utopia led by the Spanish intellectual Joaquín Costa, who forged the dream of a water nationhood. By contrast, in Colombia, several political intellectuals looked at Europe and North America as a source of inspiration to achieve progress by controlling rivers. Through the method of disjunctive comparison, I show how the same utopian notions are expressed in similar ways in distinct contexts: violently governing the flows of rivers, standardizing minds and ordering territories towards capital growth. This paper contributes to grasping the notions and roots of the discourses that have colonized the political water agendas in both countries.

Rooted Water Collectives in a Modernist and Neoliberal Imaginary: Threats and Perspectives for Rural Water Commons

“…As many concepts before, self-supply becomes a manifestation of the belief that an issue like water access can be addressed isolated from other, structural aspects of unequal capitalist society. As such, it represents an example of atomism and fits well in the imaginary of neoliberal development toward a modern utopia [21,22]. Within this imaginary, the definition of value is based on markets, and solutions are considered sustainable if they can reproduce themselves within them.…”

Unveiling Pathways to Enhance Social Learning Processes in Water Struggles

“…It is worth emphasizing that such a "dialogical unity" is not necessarily one that seeks consensus building, but one that can be better characterized as an "agonistic unity" that brings together diverse actors [27]. As the Special Issue editors and article contributors make clear, water contestations take place among these diverse and often divergent actors and become apparent by reorganizing complex socio-technical, socio-material, and symbolic relations [28][29][30][31][32]. Agonistic disputes over rivers' material, socio-normative, cultural, political, and technological dimensions come together and manifest themselves in ontological arenas and disputed worldviews and epistemologies [33,34].…”

Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland

“…Following from this, one-sided structural and teleological analyses or rational choice new-institutionalist approaches, in which actors are relatively uniform and predictable agents, miss the point. They fail to understand real-life actors' behaviours as embedded in actual social relationships (Duarte-Abadía, 2023;Dupuits, 2019;Owens et al, 2022;Zwarteveen et al, 2005). A convivial commons' analytical approach must allow for understanding how agents creatively manoeuvre within structural circumstances (e.g.…”