2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utterance-final lengthening and quantity in Northern Finnish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While this mostly remains an empirical question, the Northern Finnish data in Nakai, Kunnari, et al (2009) and Nakai, Turk, et al (2012), at least, appear consistent with the present account. That study found little overlap in the durational distributions of the voiced portion of word-final short (single) and long (double) vowel categories across phrase-medial and utterance-final positions, which could explain why the vowel length contrast is well maintained in word-final position in this variety of Finnish.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this mostly remains an empirical question, the Northern Finnish data in Nakai, Kunnari, et al (2009) and Nakai, Turk, et al (2012), at least, appear consistent with the present account. That study found little overlap in the durational distributions of the voiced portion of word-final short (single) and long (double) vowel categories across phrase-medial and utterance-final positions, which could explain why the vowel length contrast is well maintained in word-final position in this variety of Finnish.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Final lengthening, i.e., phonetic lengthening of final elements of prosodic constituents such as the phrase and utterance, is a putative language universal found in many languages, including languages with phonemic vowel length contrasts such as Dinka (Remijsen and Gilley 2008), Estonian (Krull 1997), Finnish (Nakai et al 2009), and Hungarian (Hockey and Fagyal 1999;White and Mády 2008). Curiously, in many languages with a phonemic vowel length contrast, word-final vowel length neutralization is also commonly observed towards the short vowel phoneme (see, e.g., Buckley 1998;Myers and Hansen 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local and Simpson (1988) explain these results by referring to the rhythmic properties of syllables in Malayalam. Nakai et al (2009) further find that V 2 is shorter in the context of a long rather than a short V 1 in Finnish. In none of these studies, however, has V 2 acted as a major cue for distinguishing between the singleton-geminate contrast, which may be why more emphasis has been placed on V 1 and consonant length.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Where V 2 was in final position and the last part was voiceless and low in amplitude, the end boundary was placed before the start of formant shadows/end of voicing and a hypothetical consonant was labelled to represent the last portion ( Figure 5). This was done in order not to include this last portion in the analyses of V 2 , following work by Nakai et al (2009) which suggests that the voiceless offset does not contribute to the perception of length in this vowel. It was not our intention to analyse the hypothetical consonant or claim its phonological status.…”
Section: Speakers and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study on the interaction of prosodic lengthening and vowel length contrasts in Northern Finnish, Nakai et al (2009) showed a ceiling effect in which an allophonically half-long final vowel in a CVCV word was less influenced by utterance-final lengthening relative to the other vowels. The authors proposed a durational ceiling constraint which would provide a safeguard against perceptual confusion with phonemic long vowels in Northern Finnish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%