2021
DOI: 10.1590/1678-992x-2019-0155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV-C radiation on fresh fig quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bal (2012) reported that 20 min UV-C treatment decreased decay rate in fresh fig 'Bursa Siyahi' compared to the control and 5 min UV-C treatment. Similarly, Usberti and Ferraz (2020) reported that decay rate increased with increasing storage temperature however this increase was inhibited by UV-C treatment in fresh fig cv. Roxa de Valinhos.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bal (2012) reported that 20 min UV-C treatment decreased decay rate in fresh fig 'Bursa Siyahi' compared to the control and 5 min UV-C treatment. Similarly, Usberti and Ferraz (2020) reported that decay rate increased with increasing storage temperature however this increase was inhibited by UV-C treatment in fresh fig cv. Roxa de Valinhos.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The effect of UV-C treatment was not significant at the end of the shelf-life ( Unmarketable product rate increased after 14-day storage and it reached up to 30% after 21-day cold storage plus 3 days storage at 20 °C. No UV-C damage was detected during storage and shelf-life condition however Usberti and Ferraz, (2020) reported that 4.01 kJ/m 2 UV-C treatment showed more wilting and stains than the lower doses. This difference between findings can be explained by the variety differences, maturity stages and height of the UV-C lamp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These differences may be due to the degree of ripeness, species and variety, as fruit ripening produces softening, characterized by changes in pulp texture during storage, attributed to the degradation of the structures of the primary cell wall and middle lamella, which are influenced by degradative enzymes such as polygalacturonase, pectinesterase, and cellulose [47,48]. In addition, UV-C radiation in the range from 0.7 to 4.0 kJ m -2 on figs displayed neither speeding up nor delay effects from its ripening [49].…”
Section: Grape Texture Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The above has led to the search for alternative strategies that not only protect fig fruits from damage but also extend their shelf-life. Therefore, the current studies are mostly focused on evaluating of the effect of temperature [14,15], packaging in modified atmospheres [16], the use of chemical agents [17], radiation [18], and the development of coatings that preserve the quality attributes of the fruits [9]. The most used polymers are chitosan, sodium alginate, agar, and gum Arabic [9,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%