2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV-C treatment of grape must: Microbial inactivation, toxicological considerations and influence on chemical and sensory properties of white wine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transmittance is a major parameter of winemaking; Diesler et al (2019) performed UV-C analysis on wine-related yeasts under winery conditions and demonstrated that the inactivation efficacy decreased along with higher must turbidity, optical density, and degree of microbial load; suggesting a shadowing effect of individual microbes. [30] Wine can become turbid during long-term storage for the insolubility and aggregation of residual proteins in the wine. [5] The transmittance of the five groups was between 70% and 90%, and the values of the 0.03125 g/100 mL and 0.0625 g/ 100 mL α-pinene groups were superior to those of both the control and SO 2 groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transmittance is a major parameter of winemaking; Diesler et al (2019) performed UV-C analysis on wine-related yeasts under winery conditions and demonstrated that the inactivation efficacy decreased along with higher must turbidity, optical density, and degree of microbial load; suggesting a shadowing effect of individual microbes. [30] Wine can become turbid during long-term storage for the insolubility and aggregation of residual proteins in the wine. [5] The transmittance of the five groups was between 70% and 90%, and the values of the 0.03125 g/100 mL and 0.0625 g/ 100 mL α-pinene groups were superior to those of both the control and SO 2 groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of UV-C on fruit and juices are currently under study. UV-C treatment is a nonthermal processing technique for the preservation of food [ 9 ], which can cause inactivation of spoilage yeast in grape must without causing off-flavor formation in wines. The duration of the dark period following UV-C exposure was also found to affect the control of Botrytis cinerea [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The post-harvest UV-C technique is widely applied in the storage of various fresh fruits and vegetables. This method can not only improve the secondary quality of post-harvest fruit but also provide sufficient microbial inactivation to preserve food, serving as a nonthermal processing technique [ 9 ]. UV light treatment combined with chitosan treatment can better maintain the content of anthocyanins and polyphenols in post-harvest sweet cherries and extend their shelf life [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the use of UV‐C for microbial inactivation in water and clear beverages is rapidly spreading, its application to turbid juices remains challenging. Despite some studies focused on the impact of absorbance at 254 nm (Gabriel & Ancog, 2019; Gabriel & Musni, 2019; Gayán, Serrano, Pagán, Álvarez, & Condón, 2015; Kaya & Unluturk, 2016; Reverter‐Carrión et al, 2018) and turbidity (Condón‐Abanto, Condón, Raso, Lyng, & Álvarez, 2016; Diesler et al, 2019) on UV‐C disinfection efficacy; the influence of particle size and particle aggregates remains under‐researched. UV‐C processing performance gets dramatically worse when treating liquids with low or close to zero UV transmittance (García Carrillo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%