2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV disinfection of RBC-treated light greywater effluent: Kinetics, survival and regrowth of selected microorganisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
4
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
80
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the results from the five participants were consistent (See Table S2), more replication of this study on a variety of greywater sources is necessary to confidently suggest total staphylococci as a performance surrogate for greywater treatment. A 1981 study by Abshire and Dunton [29] showed that S. aureus was more resistant to UV-C than the saprozoic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa (also typically present in greywater [13]); however, a 2007 study by Gilboa and Friedler [13] found S. aureus to be the least resistant to UV-C irradiation when compared to faecal coliforms (FC), P. aeruginosa, and Clostridium perfringens at low doses. However, as shown in this study, given the dominating concentrations of Staphylococcus spp.…”
Section: Raw Hand-rinsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the results from the five participants were consistent (See Table S2), more replication of this study on a variety of greywater sources is necessary to confidently suggest total staphylococci as a performance surrogate for greywater treatment. A 1981 study by Abshire and Dunton [29] showed that S. aureus was more resistant to UV-C than the saprozoic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa (also typically present in greywater [13]); however, a 2007 study by Gilboa and Friedler [13] found S. aureus to be the least resistant to UV-C irradiation when compared to faecal coliforms (FC), P. aeruginosa, and Clostridium perfringens at low doses. However, as shown in this study, given the dominating concentrations of Staphylococcus spp.…”
Section: Raw Hand-rinsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…as the most abundant bacterial genus in laundry greywater sourced from a university sports facility. To better understand the microbiological constituents of greywater, a literature review was conducted and identified 41 studies, however, only three studies measured greywater for total staphylococci [8][9][10], with several focusing on Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) [8,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16]. Of the three studies that measured total staphylococci, total staphylococci was found to be among the most abundant bacteria when compared to faecal coliforms (FC), total coliforms (TC), Escherichia coli (E. coli), Enterococcus spp., and other traditional faecal indicator bacteria (FIB).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, rotating biological contactor (RBC)-treated and UV-disinfected light GW resulted in a 2-log 10 decrease in fecal coliforms (FC), Staphylococcus aureus, and HPC densities and 1-log 10 decrease in Clostridium perfringens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa densities compared to raw GW (18). Similarly, HPC and FC densities were not significantly reduced by stand-alone sand filtration, whereas the use of RBC alone, RBC followed by sand filtration, and a membrane bioreactor with ultrafiltration treatment resulted in reductions of 2, 1 to 2, and 3 to 4 log 10 CFU, respectively (19).…”
Section: Cysts Litermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GWTUs process GW with varying levels of effectiveness, but many can significantly decrease the concentration of total suspended solids (TSS) ([70 % and in some systems [90 %), Fig. 1 Palestinian Hydrology Group's GWTU scheme composed of an initial settling tank (a), two anaerobic gravel-based filter tanks (b), a charcoal filter (c), and a reservoir to store water until used for irrigation (d) chemical oxygen demand (COD) ([70 %) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in water ([90 %) (Friedler et al 2006;Morel and Diener 2006;Gilboa and Friedler 2008;Halalsheh et al 2008;Winward et al 2008;Li et al 2009;Ghaitidak and Yadav 2013). If designed with the right controls and maintained properly, GWTUs can be deemed safe for environmental and human health (Alfiya et al 2013).…”
Section: Reuse Guidelines and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%