“…For example, a metal nanosphere when excited at surface plasmon resonance provides a strong near-field enhancement, which is more than five times larger than that provided by its “equivalent”, i.e., a circular nanoaperture in a metal film. − It should be noted that we do not classify nanoapertures as “nanoantennas”, which refer to conventional “nanoantenna” structures (e.g., plasmonic nanopillars and nanoparticle dimers), , simply because of their poor antenna characteristics of coupling far-field light into localized regions or vice versa. The small field enhancement leads to weak light–matter interactions within the nanoaperture, limiting the enhancement of spectroscopic signals (e.g., fluorescence and Raman) from molecules interacting with the nanoaperture. ,,− In comparison, conventional “nanoantenna” structures have shown stronger enhancement in the spectroscopic signals from the nearby molecules. − Such “nanoantenna” structures range from a single nanosphere ,− or nanorod , to the more complex engineered nanostructures such as dimers, ,− bowtie, , and Yagi-Uda . However, for many of the “nanoantenna” structures, the strong field enhancements rely on small nanogaps with dimensions of <10 nm in the structures, which often require expensive and low-throughput nanofabrication tools such as electron-beam lithography.…”