2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2003.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV/ozone modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
229
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
229
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While this plasma treatment process is incompatible with hydrogels already present on the PDMS due to vacuum requirements, a UV-Ozone treatment may be substituted to achieve the same effect at a slower rate while maintaining hydrogel integrity [59] . After subsequent hydrogel and PDMS layers were printed, the device was exposed to the flood UV lamp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this plasma treatment process is incompatible with hydrogels already present on the PDMS due to vacuum requirements, a UV-Ozone treatment may be substituted to achieve the same effect at a slower rate while maintaining hydrogel integrity [59] . After subsequent hydrogel and PDMS layers were printed, the device was exposed to the flood UV lamp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting tree-shaped structure was attempted to separate peptides in CEC mode [52]. Plasma-mediated glassification reportedly makes PDMS channel surfaces uniform [53]. Among a few disadvantages of PDMS are poorly defined EOF and adsorption of nonpolar hydrophobic samples [54][55][56].…”
Section: Pdms Microchipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface modification (or derivatization) of PDMS is normally achieved through the physical modification of the PDMS surface via plasma treatment or etching [13][14][15] or via the chemical derivatization of the surface with or without prior activation. Chemical modification relies on three primary methodologies for attaching a patent layer of alterant to the device surface: covalent attachment, [16][17][18] polymer grafting, [19][20][21][22] or matrix infiltration/chemisorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%