2020
DOI: 10.5850/jksct.2020.44.5.906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV Protection Effect of Natural Dyed Cotton Using Flos Sophorae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The UPF values obtained from the cotton dyed with hydrolyzed extract was in the range of 10.84-13.80. These values are lower than the UPF value which can be labeled on the garment that is designed for the purpose of UV protection (Gorjanc et al, 2014;Narantuya & Ahn, 2020;Sungrubbies, 2022; "Sun protective clothing, " 2021). However, by dyeing with hydrolyzed Flos Sophorae extract the UPF value of the light-weight summer cotton was enhanced to 13.80 which indicated 92.76% blockage of the UV rays as Based on the results it is possible to suggest that the present dyeing method could produce light-weight summer cotton with yellow color which could provide a moderate UV protection for daily summer attire.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The UPF values obtained from the cotton dyed with hydrolyzed extract was in the range of 10.84-13.80. These values are lower than the UPF value which can be labeled on the garment that is designed for the purpose of UV protection (Gorjanc et al, 2014;Narantuya & Ahn, 2020;Sungrubbies, 2022; "Sun protective clothing, " 2021). However, by dyeing with hydrolyzed Flos Sophorae extract the UPF value of the light-weight summer cotton was enhanced to 13.80 which indicated 92.76% blockage of the UV rays as Based on the results it is possible to suggest that the present dyeing method could produce light-weight summer cotton with yellow color which could provide a moderate UV protection for daily summer attire.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The UPF rating system along with the allowed textile labels designated by the Australian/New Zealand standard, ASTM D6544, ASTM D6603, AATCC 183 etc. is shown in Table 1 (Gorjanc et al, 2014;Narantuya & Ahn, 2020;Sungrubbies, 2022; "Sun protective clothing, " 2021). UPF value of 15 or above is required for a garment to receive the label designating the UV protective garment (Crews & Hustvedt, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations