2021
DOI: 10.1111/ijd.16003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UVA‐1 phototherapy as adjuvant treatment for eosinophilic fasciitis: in vitro and in vivo functional characterization

Abstract: Introduction Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a rare autoimmune disease causing progressive induration of dermal, hypodermal, and muscularis fascia. The exact pathogenesis is yet to be fully understood, and a validated therapy protocol still lacks. We here aimed to realize a clinical-functional characterization of these patients.Materials and methods A total of eight patients (five males, 45 years average) were treated with adjuvant high-dose UVA-1 phototherapy (90 J/cm), after having received the standard syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…29,31,36 Our experiments showed that in vitro UVA-1 irradiation performed with crescent doses and progressively longer irradiation times (range 10 s-20 min) does not affect the viability of lesional fibroblasts cultures (Table 1): these findings are in line with the behavior of lesional primary fibroblasts irradiated with UVA-1 rays 5,[11][12][13][24][25][26] and support the current consensus on the overall safety of the UVA-1 phototherapic approach. [3][4][5] In view of the complexity of the immunopathological mechanism underlying the scleroderma lesion, we chose to perform a direct gene expression assessed by RT-PCR, rather than a functional analysis, to investigate the main markers of fibrosis and anti-fibrotic pathways. Indeed, gene expression analysis makes it possible to estimate the metabolic activity of lesional fibroblasts in a given moment, as demonstrated by recent gene profiling and "transcriptomics" studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…29,31,36 Our experiments showed that in vitro UVA-1 irradiation performed with crescent doses and progressively longer irradiation times (range 10 s-20 min) does not affect the viability of lesional fibroblasts cultures (Table 1): these findings are in line with the behavior of lesional primary fibroblasts irradiated with UVA-1 rays 5,[11][12][13][24][25][26] and support the current consensus on the overall safety of the UVA-1 phototherapic approach. [3][4][5] In view of the complexity of the immunopathological mechanism underlying the scleroderma lesion, we chose to perform a direct gene expression assessed by RT-PCR, rather than a functional analysis, to investigate the main markers of fibrosis and anti-fibrotic pathways. Indeed, gene expression analysis makes it possible to estimate the metabolic activity of lesional fibroblasts in a given moment, as demonstrated by recent gene profiling and "transcriptomics" studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Localized scleroderma is still poorly studied at both epidemiological and laboratory levels, especially when compared with SSc. Actually, many patients receive late diagnosis or wrong management, exhibit long‐term corticosteroid side effects or develop functional‐aesthetical disabilities impacting life quality 1–5,23–26 . Nevertheless, it can be clinically difficult both to determine whether LS lesions are active, to define their peculiar stage and to assess the presence of subcutaneous damage 1–4,19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations