“…Multiple strategies have been employed to overcome these challenges and improve both substrate scope and catalytic performance − ; however, the major bottlenecks remaining for broadened industrial translation are the burden of labor-intensive screening steps, low economic viability, and detailed knowledge of the enzyme mechanism required to guide manipulations of the gene of interest. − Commonly used strategies to address enzyme stability and downstream processing challenges rely on compartmentalization via immobilization onto an external support material via entrapment, adsorption, or covalent cross-linking. ,, A variety of support materials have been used, including synthetic polymers, − protein cages, , carbohydrate-based biopolymers, , and vesicles. , Unfortunately, these supports often restrict enzyme and substrate mobility, leading to diffusion limitations that can negatively impact reaction rates and increase denaturization rates. , When the reaction medium contains high organic solvent content, the most commonly employed method for stabilizing the enzymes in hostile environments such as this is their dispersion within micelle or reverse micellar structures . The most widely used surfactants to stabilize enzymes within micelle or reversed micellar structures of high organic composition are sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate, Brij 30, or cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. − …”