Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014) 2014
DOI: 10.3115/v1/s14-2144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UW-MRS: Leveraging a Deep Grammar for Robotic Spatial Commands

Abstract: This paper describes a deep-parsing approach to SemEval-2014 Task 6, a novel context-informed supervised parsing and semantic analysis problem in a controlled domain. The system comprises a handbuilt rule-based solution based on a preexisting broad coverage deep grammar of English, backed up by a off-the-shelf datadriven PCFG parser, and achieves the best score reported among the task participants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the semantic parsing of robot-directed speech, rule-based systems and methods based on symbolic AI have been used for a long time [ Figure 1 (a)] (Fischer et al, 1996 ; Lauria et al, 2002 ; Ljunglöf, 2014 ; Packard, 2014 ; Savage et al, 2019 ). However, the development of rule-based semantic parsing systems requires significant labor, and such systems are usually not robust to noise, i.e., recognition errors are incurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the semantic parsing of robot-directed speech, rule-based systems and methods based on symbolic AI have been used for a long time [ Figure 1 (a)] (Fischer et al, 1996 ; Lauria et al, 2002 ; Ljunglöf, 2014 ; Packard, 2014 ; Savage et al, 2019 ). However, the development of rule-based semantic parsing systems requires significant labor, and such systems are usually not robust to noise, i.e., recognition errors are incurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the remainder of this section we compare the approaches and results of the six systems. Packard (2014) achieved the best score for parsing both with and without spatial context, at 92.5% and 90.5%, respectively, using a hybrid system that combines a rule-based grammar with the Berkeley parser (Petrov et al, 2006). The rule-based component uses the English Resource Grammar, a broad coverage handwritten HPSG grammar for English.…”
Section: Systems and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%