2022
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2022.3194924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UWB-Based Indoor Localization: How to Optimally Design the Operating Setup?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suboptimal geometry (according to the literature, optimal geometries tend to have closed shapes. See [31][32][33][34][35] for optimal geometry calculations) would generate complexities for a loosely coupled algorithm, since this would require three contemporary signals to compute a position. Nevertheless, the implemented tightly coupled algorithm fuses the available UWB signals (signals with a time difference smaller than 0.3 seg from the GNSS timestamp) with GNSS observables at every GNSS timestamp, allowing the use of even a single UWB signal.…”
Section: Maritimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suboptimal geometry (according to the literature, optimal geometries tend to have closed shapes. See [31][32][33][34][35] for optimal geometry calculations) would generate complexities for a loosely coupled algorithm, since this would require three contemporary signals to compute a position. Nevertheless, the implemented tightly coupled algorithm fuses the available UWB signals (signals with a time difference smaller than 0.3 seg from the GNSS timestamp) with GNSS observables at every GNSS timestamp, allowing the use of even a single UWB signal.…”
Section: Maritimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, single-anchor localization also faces many challenges, such as the limited information available from one anchor, the multipath propagation of the wireless signals, and the non-line-of-sight conditions. To overcome these challenges, different approaches have been proposed, such as moving mobile anchors [ 6 , 7 ], integration of external inertial measurement units (IMUs) [ 8 ], applying advanced signal processing [ 9 ] and optimization methods [ 10 , 11 ], as well as exploiting multipath signals [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, singleanchor localization also faces many challenges, such as the limited information available from one anchor, the multipath propagation of the wireless signals, and the non-line-ofsight conditions. To overcome these challenges, different approaches have been proposed, such as moving mobile anchors [6,7], integration of external inertial measurement units (IMUs) [8], applying advanced signal processing [9] and optimization methods [10,11], as well as exploiting multipath signals [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%