2023
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2023.3282299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UWB-Based Indoor Positioning System With Infinite Scalability

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2(d) shows, the concurrent TDoA time scheme involves tags receiving signals from multiple base stations without having to transmit any signals themselves. This greatly increases scalability, as additional passive tags can be easily added to the system [39][40][41][42][43][44]. There are concurrent systems in conjunction with other UWB positioning methods, including Concurrent TWR [42], Concurrent TDoA [40], and Concurrent AoA [41].…”
Section: Concurrent Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(d) shows, the concurrent TDoA time scheme involves tags receiving signals from multiple base stations without having to transmit any signals themselves. This greatly increases scalability, as additional passive tags can be easily added to the system [39][40][41][42][43][44]. There are concurrent systems in conjunction with other UWB positioning methods, including Concurrent TWR [42], Concurrent TDoA [40], and Concurrent AoA [41].…”
Section: Concurrent Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the system integration of GUULS, the ranging phase (i.e. measuring the distances between anchors and tag) is conventionally based on the TDoA technique [18] whereas the Multilateration method is normally applied for the location estimation process of the system [15], [47]. It should be noted that the mentioned ranging and positioning methods are not technically bounded, though a common practice in the field.…”
Section: B the Three Schemes Of Time-based Uwb Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the most notable strength of GUULS is that the number of tags in the system can be scaled up to the infinity [15]- [17], [21] (i.e., there is no limit for the number of tags in it). Moreover, the multiplexing scheme is generally not required in the system integration process of GUULS (Table I).…”
Section: Feature Comparison Of Uwb Localization Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, passive positioning systems involve entities that either do not carry electronic devices (for example, in healthcare applications [6]- [8], on-body sensors may not always be practical [9], [10]) or, if they do have electronic devices, do not actively contribute to the positioning algorithm and instead act as passive listeners. An illustrative example of the latter is [11], where the target determines its position by listening to messages broadcasted from the infrastructure, resembling a traditional GPS. Passive positioning systems, however, place a significant emphasis on device-free localization (DFL) systems, which involve entities without electronic devices [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%