2010
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2010.03.070333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UWB receiver designs based on a gaussian-laplacian noise-plus-MAI model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unless mentioned otherwise, it is assumed in all the following simulations that the bit energies for the desired user and multiple interfering users are E (1) = 1 and E (2) = E (3) = · · · = E (N v ) , respectively, and 500 training bits are used for estimating the GNL parameters via MME. In order that the PDF-based receiver for UWB multiple access systems has a good system performance, the tails of the PDF have to be fatter than those of the Gaussian PDF [8]. It is observed that the GNL-MME PDF has the thickest tail among the PDFs considered and closely approximates an actual distribution.…”
Section: Generalised Normal-laplace Model For Non-gaussian Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Unless mentioned otherwise, it is assumed in all the following simulations that the bit energies for the desired user and multiple interfering users are E (1) = 1 and E (2) = E (3) = · · · = E (N v ) , respectively, and 500 training bits are used for estimating the GNL parameters via MME. In order that the PDF-based receiver for UWB multiple access systems has a good system performance, the tails of the PDF have to be fatter than those of the Gaussian PDF [8]. It is observed that the GNL-MME PDF has the thickest tail among the PDFs considered and closely approximates an actual distribution.…”
Section: Generalised Normal-laplace Model For Non-gaussian Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is not easy to compare the computational loads of each stochastic approach with a specific criteria, the analysis on complexity and comparison with other methods are absent in the existing studies such as [6][7][8][9]. Thus, we will discuss the complexity by using approximated comparison (comparing used operations to obtain each PDF) between the GLM and GG distributions and the suggested GNL approach in this work.…”
Section: Complexity Of Stochastic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations