2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2009.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

V(V) species in supported catalysts: Analysis and performance in oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well documented that vanadia catalysts are active in oxidative dehydrogenation reactions at about 450 °C where vanadia can participate in redox processes [20]. The H 2 -TPR results of the present work suggests that significant reduction of our supported VO x catalysts could be attained above 400 °C.…”
Section: Catalytic Activity Measurementssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It is well documented that vanadia catalysts are active in oxidative dehydrogenation reactions at about 450 °C where vanadia can participate in redox processes [20]. The H 2 -TPR results of the present work suggests that significant reduction of our supported VO x catalysts could be attained above 400 °C.…”
Section: Catalytic Activity Measurementssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The distinct shapes of both curves can be attributed to the appearance of pseudocapacitive reactions due to the presence of vanadium, which can insert-deinsert potassium ions 21 while changing its oxidation state. 22 The shape of TiO 2 -VO x voltammograms is similar but not the same as that reported for V 2 O 5 electrodes under the same conditions, 9 as expected due to the different vanadium surface species which are likely present. 22 In addition to the increased specific capacitance, the available voltage window for TiO 2 -VO x reaches 1.6 V in our aqueous electrolyte while that for pure TiO 2 is limited to smaller values (<1.2 V) due to irreversible processes (ESI, Fig.…”
Section: àmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…It is essential to mention here the opinion of Rolison et al [23][24][25] that metal ions in the channels in the bulk of nonconducting zeolite should not produce electrochemical signal i.e., that intra-zeolite charge transfer to the zeolite bulk is not effective. We have recently confirmed this opinion by observing voltammetrically inactive isolated V(V) species in mesoporous silica [37,61]. The lack of electrochemical activity of Fe(III) monomers strongly attached to the permanent negative charges in the channels of non-conducting zeolites is hence understandable.…”
Section: Voltammetric Peaks C1 + C2 and C12mentioning
confidence: 62%