2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008183508439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Since 1969 much attention has been devoted to the useof spinfilter systems for retention of mammalian cellsin continuous perfusion cultivations. Previousinvestigations dealt with hydrodynamic conditions,fouling processes and upscaling. But hydrodynamicconditions and fouling processes seem to have asecondary importance in spinfilter performance duringauthentic perfusion cultivations. Obviously,alterations in culture condition are more relevantespecially during long-term processes. Therefore, ourpratical approac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wen et al (2000) obtained a separation efficiency of 88% using two sequential settlers. Iding et al (2000), studying perfusion cultures of CHO cells using a spin-filter, obtained efficiencies in the range of 75-95%. Apparent viability drops (trypan blue exclusion) of 2.9%, 5.7%, and 5.8% were observed for HC 3020, 3015 and 2010, respectively, while greater losses were observed for HC 2015 and 2020 (17.8% and 14.4%, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wen et al (2000) obtained a separation efficiency of 88% using two sequential settlers. Iding et al (2000), studying perfusion cultures of CHO cells using a spin-filter, obtained efficiencies in the range of 75-95%. Apparent viability drops (trypan blue exclusion) of 2.9%, 5.7%, and 5.8% were observed for HC 3020, 3015 and 2010, respectively, while greater losses were observed for HC 2015 and 2020 (17.8% and 14.4%, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steric effect of the rotating screen allows cells to be retained when the screens have pore sizes larger than the average cell [28]. Spin filters typically are made of 316L stainless steel and have pore sizes that range from 10 to 25 μm [29–31], although larger pore sizes of 50 μm and even 120 μm have been successfully used to retain cell aggregates [32] and microcarrier cultures [33]. In addition to allowing cell separation from product in perfusion cultures, the use of a spin filter has been proven to reduce hydrodynamic damage to cells; consequently, cell viability and productivity are improved when compared with cultures performed in the absence of a spin filter [34].…”
Section: Filtration Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of a spin filter can be enhanced by optimizing the culture conditions and perfusion parameters. Spin filter rotation speed and perfusion rate do not affect the retention of viable cells; however, enlarging cell diameters and the formation of aggregates during operation of a perfusion culture increase cell-retention rates from 75 to 95 % [30]. Additionally, the cell retention performance of a spin filter has been shown to be comparable with that of an ultrasonic filter.…”
Section: Spin Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%