Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the synchronous harmonics in the cross section of the CRBWO are enhanced and more efficient synchronous beam-wave interaction could be acquired than the non-coaxial one [9], a smaller interaction length of each section and a smaller guiding magnetic field length are needed. In the design of our CRBWO, the length of the guiding magnetic field is 26 cm (see figure 7, the region from −10 to 16 cm on the horizontal axis), while the length needed in the non-coaxial case is about 56 cm [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the synchronous harmonics in the cross section of the CRBWO are enhanced and more efficient synchronous beam-wave interaction could be acquired than the non-coaxial one [9], a smaller interaction length of each section and a smaller guiding magnetic field length are needed. In the design of our CRBWO, the length of the guiding magnetic field is 26 cm (see figure 7, the region from −10 to 16 cm on the horizontal axis), while the length needed in the non-coaxial case is about 56 cm [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with non-coaxial RBWO, the coaxial RBWO (CRBWO) offers a number of attractive features: firstly, because the synchronous harmonics in the cross section of the coaxial waveguide are enhanced, more efficient synchronous beam-wave interaction and higher radio-frequency (RF) power conversion efficiency may be obtained [9]; secondly, the space-charge-limiting current in the coaxial waveguide is larger than that in the former with the same wall and beam radii [10,11], which will increase the power-handling capacity; lastly, a wide frequency tunability can be achieved by varying the energy of the electron beam [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cherenkov oscillators [1][2][3][4][5] driven by relativistic electron beam are widely recognized as one of most promising high power microwave (HPM) sources for the high efficiency and high output power. Especially for the large overmoded coaxial devices [6][7][8][9][10][11], due to the high power handling capacity (PHC) and wide electron beam channel, they are widely used in the high frequency and high power fields. However, there inevitably exist multi-modes in the output microwave, which may have an impact on microwave radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, compared with the coaxial singlecorrugation SWS, 5,6 the coupling impedance in the former is larger. ͑3͒ Compared with the coaxial relativistic BWO presented by Wen et al,7 in the CGCS, the spent electrons are dumped into the inner conductor wall, which is beneficial for enhancing the efficiency due to the well-modulated electron beam before collected. ͑4͒ The coaxial SWS and the electron collector form a resonator, and in the case of resonance, the interaction can be more powerful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%