Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 528 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
67
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The following determinants of TTO productivity have been identified: organizational structure and practices, other characteristics of the TTO (e.g., age), quality and type of the technology produced by the academic institution, quality of the research institution, and regional demand for technology (Van Looy et al 2011;Belenzon and Schankerman 2009;Sellenthin 2009;Lach and Schankerman 2008;Chapple et al 2005;Di Gregorio and Shane 2003;O'Shea et al 2005;Friedman and Silberman 2003;Siegel et al 2003a;Thursby and Kemp 2002). 3 In line with the focus of this study, we address the organizational structure in detail.…”
Section: Relevant Structural Dimensions Of Ttos' Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following determinants of TTO productivity have been identified: organizational structure and practices, other characteristics of the TTO (e.g., age), quality and type of the technology produced by the academic institution, quality of the research institution, and regional demand for technology (Van Looy et al 2011;Belenzon and Schankerman 2009;Sellenthin 2009;Lach and Schankerman 2008;Chapple et al 2005;Di Gregorio and Shane 2003;O'Shea et al 2005;Friedman and Silberman 2003;Siegel et al 2003a;Thursby and Kemp 2002). 3 In line with the focus of this study, we address the organizational structure in detail.…”
Section: Relevant Structural Dimensions Of Ttos' Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies evaluating the productivity of TTOs, are based on measuring the 'outputs' and 'inputs' of technology transfer and use a production-function framework (e.g., Chapple et al 2005;Link and Siegel 2005;Siegel et al 2003a;Thursby and Kemp 2002;Van Looy et al 2011). TTO characteristics, the technological knowledge produced by the university, characteristics of the university itself, and the demand for technology are identified as important determinants of the number of licensing agreements and royalties generated (Conti and Gaulé 2009;Lach and Schankerman 2008;Link and Siegel 2005;Friedman and Silberman 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is worthwhile noting that the existing evidence on the role of public policies and TTOs in fostering U-I collaboration is mixed: Kochenkova et al (2015) provide a systematic review of academic studies on public policy measures in support of TT. Finally, other studies find that a) more efficient TT activities are positively related to the percentage of royalties (Siegel et al 2003;Phan and Siegel 2006) or rewards to faculty members involved in such activities (Friedman and Silberman 2003;Lach and Schankerman 2004), which in our model are proxied by the profit rate p.…”
Section: Comparative Staticsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Drucker and Goldstein (2007) illustrate various alternative approaches that are utilised in measuring the economic impact of a university. These include the use of surveys, to obtain direct expenditure by staff and students, as an assessment tool (see Elliott, Levin & Meisel 1988); the use of production functions to measure the importance of knowledge and innovation (see Bano & Taylor 2015;Martin 1998); individual data sets that measure the economic effect of a university through activities such as the number of spinoff firms generated as a result of research and development from a university (see Acs, Audretsch & Feldman 1994;Goldstein & Drucker 2006); and patents and licensing agreements that have developed (see Friedman & Silberman 2003) from innovation and knowledge obtained by universities. As the impact assessment approach for universities has evolved and expanded, the significant linkages that exist between the institution and the economy have been highlighted, albeit often in isolation.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%