2001
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.40.l854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vacancy Formation Energy of Silicon Determined by a New Quenching Method

Abstract: By applying a new quenching method, we determined the formation energy of vacancies in high-purity silicon. Specimens were heated in H 2 gas at high temperatures for 1 h followed by quenching in water. By this method, vacancies are quenched in the form of complexes with hydrogen and the vacancy formation energy can be determined from the quenching temperature dependence of the intensity of the optical absorption peak due to the complexes. The vacancy formation energy of silicon was determined to be about 4.0 e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the higher standard basis function DZP in SIESTA we showed that for pure silicon and pure magnesium we are able to obtain lattice constants, bulk moduli and also -more important -vacancy formation energies close to as well experimental data [14] as to other ab-initio calculations employing e.g. a plane wave pseudo potential approach [12,13] (see Table 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Using the higher standard basis function DZP in SIESTA we showed that for pure silicon and pure magnesium we are able to obtain lattice constants, bulk moduli and also -more important -vacancy formation energies close to as well experimental data [14] as to other ab-initio calculations employing e.g. a plane wave pseudo potential approach [12,13] (see Table 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Most experimental and computational literature points to a formation energy between roughly 3.2 and 3.8 eV for both interstitials and vacancies in silicon [24,25], although numbers between 2.0 and 2.5 eV have been propounded [26,27]. Our results support these lower numbers.…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…It is intuitively clear that the formation energy of such a defect is high because of the presence of an under-coordinated carbon atom. Indeed, calculations have given a value E f Ϸ 7.5 eV, 22,24 which is much higher than the vacancy formation energies in many other materials (e.g., 4.0 eV in Si 38 or less than 3 eV in most metals 39 ).…”
Section: Defect Typesmentioning
confidence: 93%