1996
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccination with syngeneic, lymphoma-derived immunoglobulin idiotype combined with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor primes mice for a protective T-cell response.

Abstract: The idiotype of the Ig expressed by a B-cell malignancy (Id) can serve as a unique tumor-specific antigen and as a model for cancer vaccine development. In murine models of Id vaccination, formulation of syngeneic Id with carrier proteins or adjuvants induces an anti-idiotypic antibody response. However, inducing a potent cell-mediated response to this weak antigen instead would be highly desirable. In the 38C13 lymphoma model, we observed that low doses of free granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
132
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
132
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All vaccines were given on day 2 of each 28-day cycle with sargramostim [granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)] 100 Ag/d given s.c. at the same site as the vaccination on days 1 to 4 and aldesleukin (IL-2) 4 MIU/M 2 given s.c. in the abdomen on days 8 to 12. The dose and schedule of GM-CSF and IL-2 were based on previous preclinical and clinical studies (12,13,25,26). GM-CSF has been shown to increase recruitment of dendritic cells and enhance clinical responses to vaccine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All vaccines were given on day 2 of each 28-day cycle with sargramostim [granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)] 100 Ag/d given s.c. at the same site as the vaccination on days 1 to 4 and aldesleukin (IL-2) 4 MIU/M 2 given s.c. in the abdomen on days 8 to 12. The dose and schedule of GM-CSF and IL-2 were based on previous preclinical and clinical studies (12,13,25,26). GM-CSF has been shown to increase recruitment of dendritic cells and enhance clinical responses to vaccine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disadvantages are uncertainty over the amount of cytokine reaching the immunization site, the difficulty in maintaining critical levels of cytokine, and the toxicity, albeit modest, associated with systemic administration. In a preclinical immunoprophylaxis model (38C13 lymphoma, C3H/HeN female mice), Kwak et al 14 achieved success with systemically administered GM-CSF. However, s.c. administration at the immunization site was more effective in inducing protection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MHC class I peptides confer MUC1 specificity leading to the induction of CTL-mediated anti-tumor responses; the Hepatitis B core antigen-derived MHC class II pan T helper peptide was included to boost CD8 + anti-tumor responses [30,31]; CpG-ODN was included to promote DC activation via its interaction with Toll-like receptor (TLR)-9 [32,33] to enhance CTL responses, expansion and survival [33][34][35][36][37]. GM-CSF promotes antigen presentation and DC recruitment to vaccine sites [38][39][40][41] and is commonly used as a biological adjuvant in preclinical and clinical immunotherapy studies [42,43]. In separate experiments, groups of MUC1.Tg/MIN and MIN mice were immunized with the peptide-based vaccine (peptides + CpG-ODN + GM-CSF) or the non-peptide-based vaccine (CpG-ODN + GM-CSF) on day 66 when the mice harbored large numbers of adenomas.…”
Section: Effect Of Peptide Vaccination On Adenoma Formation In Muc1tmentioning
confidence: 99%