2010
DOI: 10.4161/hv.6.9.12470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccine effectiveness against laboratory-confirmed influenza in infants: A matched case control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also discovered that partial vaccination showed no protection in 2011–2012 season; this finding is similar to the findings of Eisenberg in the 2003–2004 and 2004–2005 influenza seasons and of Cochran in the 2003–2004, 2004–2005, and 2005–2006 influenza seasons in the United States …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also discovered that partial vaccination showed no protection in 2011–2012 season; this finding is similar to the findings of Eisenberg in the 2003–2004 and 2004–2005 influenza seasons and of Cochran in the 2003–2004, 2004–2005, and 2005–2006 influenza seasons in the United States …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…4 Our estimated VE was consistent with reported findings in other countries. For example, Joshi found that in Olmsted County, 15 We also discovered that partial vaccination showed no protection in 2011-2012 season; this finding is similar to the findings of Eisenberg 16 It has already been shown that the degree of antigenic matching between the circulating and vaccine strains affects VE. 17 Belongia et al 18 reported that the influenza VE was <25% for mismatched subtypes, but 50-95% for wellmatched subtypes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The best example in this regard is provided by the 3‐year case–control analysis of infants aged 6–23 months carried out by Cochran et al. [31]; this found no efficacy during the first two influenza seasons in which the vaccine strains were largely mismatched with the circulating strains, and an efficacy of 59% during the third year when the match was much better. A strict relationship between vaccine match and vaccine efficacy is also acknowledged in adults [35].…”
Section: Injectable Influenza Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the efficacy of TIVs is significantly less when the viral strains included in the vaccine do not perfectly match those circulating in the community during an epidemic. Heikkinen and Heinonen [26] examined the data collected in ten clinical trials [22,24,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] that evaluated the efficacy of TIVs in children aged <5 years using laboratory tests to confirm the diagnosis of influenza, and found that the protection offered by these vaccines strictly related to the degree of matching: when matching was very good, efficacy was always 60% or more (and in some cases higher than 80%); in the case of a poor match, it was always less than 60%, and sometimes near 0% [26]. The best example in this regard is provided by the 3-year case-control analysis of infants aged 6-23 months carried out by Cochran et al [31]; this found no efficacy during the first two influenza seasons in which the vaccine strains were largely mismatched with the circulating strains, and an efficacy of 59% during the third year when the match was much better.…”
Section: Injectable Influenza Vaccines Trivalent Inactivated Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[153,156,157] Several observational studies of TIV VE among children less than 5 years of age have found a VE of 60-85% in seasons where vaccine strains are well-matched to circulating strains, but a VE of 0-60% when vaccines are poorly matched to circulating strains. [158][159][160][161][162][163][164] In addition to the direct protection of children conferred by influenza immunization, limited data indicate that protection of unvaccinated household [165,166] and community contacts [154] may be conferred by immunization of children.…”
Section: Inactivated Influenza Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%