2021
DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccine hesitancy and behavior change theory-based social media interventions: a systematic review

Abstract: It is widely acknowledged that vaccine hesitancy is a multifaceted problem that cannot be addressed by a single strategy. Behavior change theories and social media tools may together help to guide the design of interventions aimed at improving vaccination uptake. This systematic review aims to identify the breadth and effectiveness of such theories and tools. The systematic review search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, ACM, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, and Web of Science databases for studies between January 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vaccine hesitancy is multifaceted and dynamic and, thus, unlikely to be mitigated through a single strategy or intervention approach. 62 , 63 Current literature identifies a range of possible interventions to address vaccine hesitancy, build confidence in vaccines, and promote vaccine‐seeking behavior. 63 , 64 , 65 Interventions targeting “thoughts and feelings” about vaccination, social processes, and direct behavior change have been implemented in various forms, but not all interventions are equally effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vaccine hesitancy is multifaceted and dynamic and, thus, unlikely to be mitigated through a single strategy or intervention approach. 62 , 63 Current literature identifies a range of possible interventions to address vaccine hesitancy, build confidence in vaccines, and promote vaccine‐seeking behavior. 63 , 64 , 65 Interventions targeting “thoughts and feelings” about vaccination, social processes, and direct behavior change have been implemented in various forms, but not all interventions are equally effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social processes related to vaccination have also been successfully targeted for intervention, such as with the National HPV Vaccination Roundtable 63 or various dialogue‐based social media interventions. 62 Social process interventions may also benefit from adaptation and targeting for specific levels across the hesitancy continuum. Finally, interventions that target direct behavior change have been described as reliably effective in increasing vaccination, with ease of access, use of incentives, sanctions, or requirements all showing efficacy in randomized trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaccine hesitancy: Vaccine hesitancy is not a clear issue, but rather represents a spectrum of beliefs and concerns [31]. Existing research reports that factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance may include gender, background knowledge, perceived risk of COVID-19, vaccine knowledge, vaccine confidence, etc., and vary between different populations [11].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of misinformation on social media includes links between the 5G mobile network and COVID-19, and the theory that the pandemic is a bioweapon or conspiracy (8). Recent systematic review of vaccines hesitancy and social media interventions illustrated a major gap and lack of robust evaluation results (2). As social media grows exponentially, the anti-vax movement is also expected to spread further across the multitude of platforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%