2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccine potential of recombinant pro- and mature cathepsinL1 against fasciolosis gigantica in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have reported the usefulness of chimeric vaccine antigen prepared from FhCatL1 and leucine aminopeptidase (FhLAP) in eliciting an immune response and conferring protection against challenge infection in both rabbit ( 49 ), and sheep ( 81 ). Concerning vaccine researches applied on F. gigantica , immunization of mice with recombinant pro and mature FgCatL1 showed a protective potential against challenge infection when compared with non-immunized control group ( 82 , 83 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other studies have reported the usefulness of chimeric vaccine antigen prepared from FhCatL1 and leucine aminopeptidase (FhLAP) in eliciting an immune response and conferring protection against challenge infection in both rabbit ( 49 ), and sheep ( 81 ). Concerning vaccine researches applied on F. gigantica , immunization of mice with recombinant pro and mature FgCatL1 showed a protective potential against challenge infection when compared with non-immunized control group ( 82 , 83 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Noteworthy, Hanna and Jura [48] described that significantly more F. gigantica flukes successfully established in mice via intraperitoneal injection of NEJ than oral infection with metacercariae. The authors attributed these differences to inappropriate physicochemical conditions for excystment in the gut of the mouse, although the mouse model has been considered suitable for studies on migration and establishment of F. gigantica by several authors (e.g., [49]). Whether these differences are also true for F. hepatica is a matter of future investigations and could contribute to decipher the importance of intestinal passage in the physiology and establishment of F. hepatica in the vertebrate host.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors attributed these differences to inappropriate physicochemical conditions for excystment in the gut of the mouse, although the mouse model has been considered suitable for studies on migration and establishment of F . gigantica by several authors (e.g., [ 49 ]). Whether these differences are also true for F .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaccination is a more cost-effective, sustainable, and environmentally friendly method for controlling the disease and is considered safe for animals and consumers [8]. Previous publications showed that several Fasciola antigens have been tested for the vaccine against fasciolosis, including fatty acid binding protein (FABP) [9], cathepsins B2 and B3 [10], glutathione S-transferase (GST) [11,12], cathepsin L [13][14][15][16], tetraspanin 2 (TSP2) [17], leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) [18][19][20], and saposinlike protein (SAP) [21][22][23][24][25]. Immunizations with recombinant proteins from F. gigantica, including 2-Cys peroxiredoxin (Prx) in mice and buffaloes [26,27], cathepsin L1 in mice, cattle, and sheep [14][15][16], cathepsin L1H in mice [13], cathepsin L1G in mice [28], GST in mice and buffalo [11,12], superoxide dismutase (SOD) in mice [29], cathepsin B2 and B3 [10], LAP in mice [18], SAP-1 in mice [21], and SAP-2 in mice [22] have been shown to protect against F. gigantica infection with a limited outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%