2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccines are not associated with autism: An evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
245
0
33

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 433 publications
(281 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
245
0
33
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to observations in developed countries where caregivers are beginning to reject immunization because of the misconception that it causes autism. [24][25][26] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to observations in developed countries where caregivers are beginning to reject immunization because of the misconception that it causes autism. [24][25][26] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases it was noted by the Court of Federal Claims, or indicated in settlement agreements, that the children had autism or ASD [39]. On the other hand, numerous epidemiological studies have found no association between receipt of selected vaccines (in particular the combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine) and autism [10,[40][41][42][43][44][45], and there is no accepted mechanism by which vaccines could induce autism [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the history of publishing has shown that peer review does not necessarily guarantee scientific integrity [15][16][17]. There are numerous cases of influential peer-reviewed articles that were later retracted [15], such as articles correlating vaccination and autism [3,4], reporting the cloning of human embryos [5,18], and attributing morphology of the human hand to Intelligent Design [6]. As pointed out by Sheldon [1], uncritical reporting based on peer-reviewed articles can spread misinformation and harm.…”
Section: Textmentioning
confidence: 99%