2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2011.12.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vacuum brazing of aluminium metal matrix composite (55vol.% SiCp/A356) using aluminium-based filler alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Al 2 Cu phase was also detected in the research by Niu et al [17]. Meanwhile, some gray phase, which was confirmed to be TiAl 3 , formed between the Ti particles and the aluminum matrix.…”
Section: Interfacial Microstructure Of the Cs Jointmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The Al 2 Cu phase was also detected in the research by Niu et al [17]. Meanwhile, some gray phase, which was confirmed to be TiAl 3 , formed between the Ti particles and the aluminum matrix.…”
Section: Interfacial Microstructure Of the Cs Jointmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Based on these issues, it is necessary to develop ternary or multi-element alloys with good mechanical properties and relatively low melting temperature. According to the works reported [28][29][30][31] , the quaternary Al-Si-Cu-Ni alloy has a relatively low melting temperature. What is more, the Ni and Cu elements can form solid solutions with each other and improve the ductility and toughness of the filler metal.…”
Section: Current Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, the brazing temperatures using the Al-based filler metals are located in the range of 550~600 °C. Compared with the direct brazing SiCp/A356 composite using the 69Al-24Cu-1.5Mg-5Si-0.5Ni as filler metal at 550 °C (a) and 560 °C (b) [28] coating electroless plated on a HFC SiCp/Al composite [45] processes and the corresponding maximum joint strength, most of the optimal holding time is prolonged and all the maximum joint shear strength values are enhanced to o ver 100 MPa except for using the Sn-Ag-Ni filler metal. This sharp decrease of joint strength obtained by the Sn-based filler metal can be attributed to the undesirable interfacial layer involving Ni-Sn-P, Ni 3 P and Ni-P phases derived from the chemical reactions between the Sn-Ag-Ni filler metal and the Ni(-P) coating [50] .…”
Section: Brazing After Metallizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The published brazing filler metals can be classified into three groups with different melting regions: (I) Zn-Al(-Cu), [9][10][11][12] (II) Al-12Si (4047), [13,14] and Al-11.6Si-1.5Mg [4N04 with a melting range of 840 K to 850 K (567°C to 577°C)] systems, [7,8,[14][15][16][17] and (III) Al-28Cu-5Si-2Mg with a melting range of 798 K to 808 K (525°C to 535°C) [18,19] and Al-24Cu-5-Si-0.5Ni. [20] For Zn-based filler metals, flux (hygroscopic chlorides), [9] ultrasonic vibration, [10,11] or stirring [12] must be introduced to remove oxide film on the Al matrix surface at a lower joining temperature in air. For Al-Si brazing filler metal, an interfacial gap (1 lm) at R/M interface was observed, [13] and it was easy to discharge from the joint interface under pressure, leading to the lack of dissolution of Al matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%