Vad gör socionomerna för skillnad i den psykiatriska vården?

Framme, Gunilla

doi:10.3384/svt.2014.21.2.2421

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Yrkesgruppen arbetar i många av hälso-och sjukvårdens olika verksamheter, exempelvis primärvård, sjukhusvård och universitetssjukhusvård (se t.ex. Framme, 2014;Heiwe m.fl., 2013). Hälso-och sjukvårdskuratorn är verksam i en kontext som primärt är präglad av ett medicinskt och vårdvetenskapligt perspektiv, därmed utgör hälso-och sjukvårdskuratorn en minoritet med anledning av sin samhällsvetenskapliga utbildningsbakgrund och sitt psykosociala perspektiv (Sjöström, 2013).…”

Section: Inledningunclassified

“…Således kan hälso-och sjukvårdskuratorns uppdrag och arbetsuppgifter skilja sig åt beroende på hälso-och sjukvårdkontext (Sernbo, 2019). Framme (2014) har beskrivit yrkesrollen som att den i hög grad formas genom en socialisering på arbetsplatsen.…”

Section: Inledningunclassified

“…Liksom majoriteten av socionomer generellt så är majoriteten av hälso-och sjukvårdskuratorerna kvinnor (Sernbo, 2019). Det beskrivs som vanligt att hälso-och sjukvårdskuratorerna har olika former av vidareutbildningar utöver sin kandidatexamen (Framme, 2014).…”

Section: Inledningunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Vetenskapligt kunskapsutnyttjande och nyttjande av kunskapskällor bland hälso- och sjukvårdskuratorer

Ståhl,

Lundälv

2024

SVT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research knowledge utilisation and the use of knowledge sources among health social workers - a comparison based on licence Previous research has shown that health social workers make little use of research knowledge in their professional practice. The purpose of the study was to investigate possible differences between licensed and non-licensed health social workers based on background factors, research knowledge utilisation and use of knowledge sources. The study was based on a national web survey that was answered by a total of 1236 health social workers. The survey responses were analysed using cross-tabulations, Chi2 tests and binary logistic regression. The results showed that there were differences in a number of background factors: sex, number of years in the profession, highest completed education and whether the respondents had studied all/part of their education abroad. All these background factors, with the exception of gender, were found in the regression analysis to be associated with licence status. The results show that there was a difference in the frequency of reading research literature between licensed and non-licensed respondents. The respondents' answers regarding the most important sources of knowledge in their work differed with respect to four variables: theory, life experience, colleagues and supervision. In comparison, their answers regarding the barriers that affect them most differed with respect to only one variable: lack of organisational support for applying scientific knowledge in practice. The study’s main results show that there are no major differences in terms of research knowledge utilisation between licensed and non-licensed health social workers. Rather, the results indicate that there are more similarities between the groups. In terms of use of knowledge sources, however, both differences and similarities between the groups were demonstrated. The article proposes an important question for further research and highlights implications for practice.

show abstract

Section: Inledningunclassified