2007
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e318155a7a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vagal-Sparing Esophagectomy

Abstract: Survival with intramucosal adenocarcinoma or Barrett's with high-grade dysplasia is independent of the type of resection. A vagal-sparing esophagectomy is associated with significantly less perioperative morbidity and a shorter hospital stay than a transhiatal or en bloc esophagectomy. Further, late morbidity including weight loss, dumping, and diarrhea are significantly less likely after a vagal-sparing approach. Consequently a vagal-sparing esophagectomy is the preferred procedure for patients with intramuco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the learning curve of this procedure is steep, limiting generalizability. Vagal sparing esophagectomy is a technique wherein the vagus nerve is spared by removing the esophagus without regional lymphadenectomy, leaving the vagal innervation of the distal stomach intact: a technique thought to be ideal for patients with HGD and intramucosal adenocarcinoma who have a low risk of metastatic lymphadenopathy 28 . However in a study comparing the outcomes of this technique with the Ivor Lewis technique and the transhiatal technique, a 30 day mortality of 2% and an overall morbidity rate of 30% were reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the learning curve of this procedure is steep, limiting generalizability. Vagal sparing esophagectomy is a technique wherein the vagus nerve is spared by removing the esophagus without regional lymphadenectomy, leaving the vagal innervation of the distal stomach intact: a technique thought to be ideal for patients with HGD and intramucosal adenocarcinoma who have a low risk of metastatic lymphadenopathy 28 . However in a study comparing the outcomes of this technique with the Ivor Lewis technique and the transhiatal technique, a 30 day mortality of 2% and an overall morbidity rate of 30% were reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with mucosal EAC however appear to have better outcomes with both endoscopic and surgical series describing 5 year survival rates exceeding 80% 6, 12, 28, 29 . Factors predictive of survival after esophagectomy include absence of metastatic lymphadenopathy 6 , tumor histology, achieving clear margins (R0 resection), response to chemoradiotherapy and stage of the tumor 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with pT1a adenocarcinomas, this operation showed the same long-term results as more radical esophagectomies [47,55,56]. However, this procedure seems to be quite extensive, as a large portion of the sound esophagus is removed.…”
Section: Surgerymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…11 Outcomes may be even better following vagal sparing esophagectomy. 15 So where do we stand? Endoscopic therapy can and should be embraced with enthusiasm.…”
Section: Morbidity Mortality and Functional Outcome Of Esophagectommentioning
confidence: 98%