2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05417-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaginal birth vs caesarean section for extremely preterm vertex infants: a systematic review and meta-analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the mode of delivery does not affect the mortality or morbidity rate in preterm infants. However, recent prospective cohort studies and systematic reviews have shown the protective effect of cesarean section on neonatal mortality in EPIs at the threshold of viability [43-45]. Because our study population had an extremely low gestational age (≤25 weeks), we speculated that the highest mortality rate in period 3 might be partly attributed to the lowest cesarean section rate, along with the highest histologic chorioamnionitis rate therein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is well known that the mode of delivery does not affect the mortality or morbidity rate in preterm infants. However, recent prospective cohort studies and systematic reviews have shown the protective effect of cesarean section on neonatal mortality in EPIs at the threshold of viability [43-45]. Because our study population had an extremely low gestational age (≤25 weeks), we speculated that the highest mortality rate in period 3 might be partly attributed to the lowest cesarean section rate, along with the highest histologic chorioamnionitis rate therein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If the pregnant woman is not healthy, the fetus will be adversely affected. Studies regarding routine cesarean section in extreme prematurity do not provide risk–benefit clarity, complicating uncertainty about providing palliative care or intensive care for the infant [ 70 ]. Shared decision-making should be used to support the pregnant woman regarding cesarean section decisions if intensive care is going to be provided to the infant [ 11 , 12 , 30 , 71 ].…”
Section: Main Text (Dialogic Discussion)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two previous meta‐analyses and one Cochrane review on the topic. Jarde et al 60 . included only cephalic fetuses born before 28 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two previous meta-analyses and one Cochrane review on the topic. Jarde et al 60 included only cephalic fetuses born before 28 weeks. However, inclusion of cases with congenital anomaly and the use of birth certificate data, which may be subject to low reliability and validity, potential systematic errors and uncontrollable missing information 61 , constituted major limitations of the study.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%