1990
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91302-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaginal ultrasonographic assessment of cervical length changes during normal pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
53
3
15

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
8
53
3
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study has demonstrated that the mean cervical length of 37 mm was similar to that of other studies that measured cervical length at 20-24 weeks in low-risk populations in different settings (Table 6) (2,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The present study has demonstrated that the mean cervical length of 37 mm was similar to that of other studies that measured cervical length at 20-24 weeks in low-risk populations in different settings (Table 6) (2,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Results of other studies are more variable: some found that cervical length did not change during pregnancy 12 , others found a continuous decrease from 10 to 40 weeks 13 or from 17 to 37 weeks 20 , while others still 14 reported that the cervix became longer between 8 and 25 weeks and then shortened. In most studies cervical length did not differ between nulliparous and parous women 13,14,20,28,29 , however in some the cervix was longer in parous women 17,18 . The discrepant results may be explained by differences in measurement technique, study design, the period in gestation studied, the statistical methods used, and the interpretation of the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Using transvaginal sonography, Kushnir and colleagues reported a longer cervical length in patients between 20 and 25 weeks of gestation than in patients both earlier and later in gestation. 5 They reported no linear relationship between gestational age and cervical length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%