2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vagus nerve stimulation-induced laryngeal motor evoked potentials for response prediction and intensity titration in drug-resistant epilepsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this point of view, it seems reasonable to focus on this topic. Several authors have identi ed individual preimplantation markers differentiating between VNS responders and nonresponders, including in the analysis of laryngeal motor evoked potentials [54] and in works based on MRI [55,56] or magnetoencephalography (MEG) data analysis [57]. We can expect that at least some of these markers will be successfully incorporated into predictive algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this point of view, it seems reasonable to focus on this topic. Several authors have identi ed individual preimplantation markers differentiating between VNS responders and nonresponders, including in the analysis of laryngeal motor evoked potentials [54] and in works based on MRI [55,56] or magnetoencephalography (MEG) data analysis [57]. We can expect that at least some of these markers will be successfully incorporated into predictive algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this point of view, it seems reasonable to focus on this topic. Several authors have identified individual preimplantation markers differentiating between VNS responders and non-responders, including in the analysis of laryngeal motor evoked potentials 55 and in works based on MRI 56 , 57 or magnetoencephalography (MEG) data analysis 58 . We can expect that at least some of these markers will be successfully incorporated into predictive algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%