“…For the MoNi 4 /MoO 2 sample, the peak at 852.62 eV (Figure b) corresponds to Ni 0 , while other peaks at 855.98 and 873.62 eV are attributed to the Ni 2+ oxidation state. ,, For the MoS 2 :MoNi 4 /MoO 2 hybrid material (Figure b), the characteristic peak positions of Ni 2p were found at 850.86 and 854.61 eV, which are attributed to the oxidation states of Ni 0 and Ni 2+ , respectively. Figure c shows the O 1s spectrum of MoNi 4 /MoO 2 at 530.49 eV, which is the characteristic of Mo–O species in MoO 2 , while the other peak at 532.98 eV is attributed to the H–O bond of surface absorption species at oxygen vacancies. , Furthermore, Figure d shows that the characteristic S 2p peak appeared only in the hybrid MoS 2 :MoNi 4 /MoO 2 and the respective peak positions at 162.35 and 163.53 eV are associated with the 2p 3/2 and 2p 1/2 spin–orbit doublets, respectively, indicating the S 2– oxidation state of sulfur from MoS 2 . , From the above XPS analysis, it is evident that the Mo 0 and Mo 4+ oxidation states refer to the successful formation of MoNi 4 and MoO 2 , respectively, in a solid solution where the intermetallic MoNi 4 gets phase-separated in the MoO 2 matrix for both the samples of MoNi 4 /MoO 2 and MoS 2 :MoNi 4 /MoO 2 . The presence of the Ni 0 oxidation state implies the formation of MoNi 4 in both the samples, while the appearance of Mo–O in the O 1s peak justifies the formation of MoO 2 in the composite nanorod.…”