2021
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202100203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valence‐State Effect of Iridium Dopant in NiFe(OH)2 Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

Abstract: Engineering high‐performance electrocatalysts is of great importance for energy conversion and storage. As an efficient strategy, element doping has long been adopted to improve catalytic activity, however, it has not been clarified how the valence state of dopant affects the catalytic mechanism and properties. Herein, it is reported that the valence state of a doping element plays a crucial role in improving catalytic performance. Specifically, in the case of iridium doped nickel‐iron layer double hydroxide (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peaks of Raman shift in NiFe-60/Co 3 O 4 @NF at 474 and 539 cm –1 correspond to Ni 2+ –O–Ni 2+ /Fe 3+ and Fe 3+ –O–Fe 3+ , respectively, while another peak at 689 cm –1 is attributed to the intercalated CO 3 2– , reflecting the formation of NiFe-LDH. For NiFe-60@NF, the same bands corresponding to the above functional groups appear at around 462, 546, and 678 cm –1 , respectively. Obviously, the red shift or blue shift was presented according to the comparison of these peaks (NiFe-60/Co 3 O 4 @NF vs NiFe-60@NF: 474 vs 462 cm –1 , 539 vs 546 cm –1 , 689 vs 678 cm –1 ). They should be ascribed to the lattice distortion caused by the increased defects that originated from the formation of the amorphous phase in NiFe-LDH .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peaks of Raman shift in NiFe-60/Co 3 O 4 @NF at 474 and 539 cm –1 correspond to Ni 2+ –O–Ni 2+ /Fe 3+ and Fe 3+ –O–Fe 3+ , respectively, while another peak at 689 cm –1 is attributed to the intercalated CO 3 2– , reflecting the formation of NiFe-LDH. For NiFe-60@NF, the same bands corresponding to the above functional groups appear at around 462, 546, and 678 cm –1 , respectively. Obviously, the red shift or blue shift was presented according to the comparison of these peaks (NiFe-60/Co 3 O 4 @NF vs NiFe-60@NF: 474 vs 462 cm –1 , 539 vs 546 cm –1 , 689 vs 678 cm –1 ). They should be ascribed to the lattice distortion caused by the increased defects that originated from the formation of the amorphous phase in NiFe-LDH .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This accounts for the higher HER activity of Ni/NiFe LDH, comparing with E-Ni and NiFe LDH. As for OER, the additional nickel can reduce the electron transport resistance, and there are many previous works and DFT calculations that prove the extremely excellent OER catalytic activity. , Overall, the theoretical simulation reveals that the abundant heterostructure interfaces considerably improve the electronic conductivity and reduce reaction barriers, thus resulting in superior OWS activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The interface between E-Ni and NiFe LDH is built by Ni (111) and NiFe LDH (001) (Figures S26, S27) because of a small interfacial lattice mismatch, which is a common approach in constructing a heterostructure for theoretical calculations. 48 The charge density difference of Ni/NiFe LDH was analyzed (Figure 5a,b 58,59 Overall, the theoretical simulation reveals that the abundant heterostructure interfaces considerably improve the electronic conductivity and reduce reaction barriers, thus resulting in superior OWS activity. 2.5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2c shows the Pt 4f spectrum of Pt/A-NiCo LDH, where the peaks located at 72.72 and 76.1 eV are ascribed to the Pt 2+ 4f 7/2 and Pt 4f 5/2 , respectively. In addition, the Ir 4f and Rh 3d spectra confirm the existence of Ir 3+ and Rh 3+ , respectively 14,15 (Fig. S14, ESI†).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…1–3 At present, noble metals ( e.g. Pt, 4 Pd, 5 Ir 6 and Ru) are considered as the benchmark electrocatalysts for the HER in acid and alkaline conditions, respectively. However, the high cost, limited resources and poor stability largely hinder their large-scale application.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%