2006
DOI: 10.1075/tsl.65.06hoo
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valency sets in Kashmiri

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…: kər‐ ‘do’, kər‐av‐ ‘make do’, kər‐av‐ av‐ ‘cause to make do’; bes‐ ‘sit’, bes‐a ‐ ‘seat’, bes‐a ‐av‐ ‘make seat’. Kashmiri also attests multiply marked causatives (Hook & Koul : 57–9) Such ‘double’ causatives in these languages do not necessarily have a double causative function. In other Indo‐Aryan languages, including Marathi and Sindhi, there is no morphologically double causative marker…”
Section: The ‘Double’ Causative ‐Vāvmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…: kər‐ ‘do’, kər‐av‐ ‘make do’, kər‐av‐ av‐ ‘cause to make do’; bes‐ ‘sit’, bes‐a ‐ ‘seat’, bes‐a ‐av‐ ‘make seat’. Kashmiri also attests multiply marked causatives (Hook & Koul : 57–9) Such ‘double’ causatives in these languages do not necessarily have a double causative function. In other Indo‐Aryan languages, including Marathi and Sindhi, there is no morphologically double causative marker…”
Section: The ‘Double’ Causative ‐Vāvmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hook & Koul (2006: 50-1) note a couple of such instances in Kashmiri, but they do not claim that there is a semantic difference between the two transitive stems, e.g. gal-'melt (intr.)'…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a significant body of work on the causative in South Asian languages from a range of analytical traditions (e.g., Kachru ; Masica ; Saksena ; Butt ; Bhatt & Embick ; Butt & King ; Butt, King & Ramchand ; Ramchand ). However, the specific attributes of the causative in Kashmiri have been given little more than descriptive attention (Hook & Koul , ; Syeed ; Altaha ), or addressed comparatively (Wali , ; Bhatt ; Bhatt & Embick ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the event-changing operations, the causative is fairly widespread as an argument-increasing technique, while the resultative and the anticausative constitute the most common argument-reducing operations. The following examples are taken respectively from Kashmiri (7a-b) (Hook & Koul 2006), Chichewa (7c) (Dubinsky & Simango 1996), and Lithuanian (7d-e) (Geniušienė 2006…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%