1972
DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1972.tb01407.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valeur Du Test De Provocation Par Allergenes Inhales Dans l'ASTHME

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in marked contrast to those obtained with the intradermal method of skin testing where positive bronchial responses have been found in a variable percentage of patients with positive intradermal skin tests and in from I";, to 40% of patients in whom skin reactivity was classed as negative (Nilsson & Kaude, 1960;Colldahl. 1967;Aas, 1970;Maier, Orion & Deviller, 1970;Gayrard et al, 1972). However, as intradermal tests tend to produce more nonspecifically positive reactions than do prick tests (Pepys, 1972), as the criteria that were used in these studies to define positive cutaneous and bronchial responses differed, and as the degree of control over those variables which influence the assessment of cutaneous and bronchial reactivity varied widely, these differences in the observed relationship between the allergic reactivity of the skin and the bronchi are not surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in marked contrast to those obtained with the intradermal method of skin testing where positive bronchial responses have been found in a variable percentage of patients with positive intradermal skin tests and in from I";, to 40% of patients in whom skin reactivity was classed as negative (Nilsson & Kaude, 1960;Colldahl. 1967;Aas, 1970;Maier, Orion & Deviller, 1970;Gayrard et al, 1972). However, as intradermal tests tend to produce more nonspecifically positive reactions than do prick tests (Pepys, 1972), as the criteria that were used in these studies to define positive cutaneous and bronchial responses differed, and as the degree of control over those variables which influence the assessment of cutaneous and bronchial reactivity varied widely, these differences in the observed relationship between the allergic reactivity of the skin and the bronchi are not surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative studies have established that this bronchial effect was related to the ~-blocking potency and selectivity of the drugs [13,14]. These early studies also suggested that induced bronchoconstriction was more pronounced in more severe asthma [2,15]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that dl-propranolol hydrochloride (P) can be safely administered by inhalation in a stepwise manner [15][16][17][18][19], and that it induces a dose-dependent bronchoconstriction [17][18][19] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These early studies also suggested that induced bronchoconstriction was more pronounced in more severe asthma [2,15]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that dl-propranolol hydrochloride (P) can be safely administered by inhalation in a stepwise manner [15][16][17][18][19], and that it induces a dose-dependent bronchoconstriction [17][18][19] . However, clinical and physiological factors which influence bronchial responsiveness to propranolol in asthmatic patients are poorly understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%