Valeur sociale des éléments du noyau central : la norme représentationnelle de centralité

Zouhri, Bouchra; Rateau, Patrick

doi:10.3917/cips.106.0129

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The second one is the self-presentation paradigm, first proposed by Jellison and Green (1981;see Gilibert & Cambon, 2003), which has proven a highly effective tool in determining if a particular self-presentation strategy can be used to achieve positive evaluations (see, for example, Bonetto et al, 2020). A common protocol requires participants to present themselves to give either a good impression (a condition capturing pro-normative responses) or a bad impression (a condition capturing counter-normative responses; e.g., Dubois, 2000;Gilibert & Cambon, 2003;Darnon et al, 2009;Zouhri & Rateau, 2015;Bastart et al, 2018).…”

Section: The Current Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

You're heartless, I’m less: Moral judgment and social norm

Trémolière¹,

Rateau²

2020

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Are moral judgments to sacrificial dilemmas shaped by a latent social norm? The present research addresses this issue. We report a set of four studies which question the existence of a social norm in the longstanding deontism/utilitarian debate by relying on two original tools, namely substitution technique and self-presentation paradigm. Study 1 showed that American participants asked to answer like most Americans would do were more utilitarian than control participants who answered in their own name (Study 1). Study 2 showed that participants instructed to answer in a disapproval fashion were more utilitarian than both participants instructed to answer in an approval fashion and control participants. Importantly, no difference was observed between the approval and control conditions, suggesting that participants naturally align their moral judgments with a latent norm. Study 3a and 3b explored the effect of the activation of a deontic norm using the substitution instruction on subsequent impression formation. Although we replicated the effect of substitution instruction, we failed to show that activating a norm in a given individual shaped its evaluation of other people who do not align with this norm. Finally, we report a mini meta-analysis targeting the pooled effect and homogeneity among our studies.

show abstract