2023
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/3htzc
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valid and Reliable? Basic and Expanded Recommendations for Psychometric Reporting and Quality Assessment.

Abstract: There is a need to improve the validity, reliability, and replicability of social and health science research and its applications through raising the quality of measurement. An important step is to establish and implement a clear and useful standard for reporting and assessing psychometric properties of measures. We propose five basic criteria as a minimal checklist to help end users assess the quality of psychometric studies: unidimensionality; ordered response categories, invariance; targeting; and, conting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Targeting of items compared to respondents was reviewed by visualizing the distribution of person locations on the same scale as the distribution of item threshold locations and calculating mean and standard deviations for both distributions. Measurement invariance was assessed by analyzing potential differential item functioning (DIF) related to age and gender, with 0.5 logits as a DIF size cutoff value (27). Reliability was assessed by a test information function (TIF) curve and reporting the proportions of respondents located within the scale range where reliability was estimated at or above person separation index 0.7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Targeting of items compared to respondents was reviewed by visualizing the distribution of person locations on the same scale as the distribution of item threshold locations and calculating mean and standard deviations for both distributions. Measurement invariance was assessed by analyzing potential differential item functioning (DIF) related to age and gender, with 0.5 logits as a DIF size cutoff value (27). Reliability was assessed by a test information function (TIF) curve and reporting the proportions of respondents located within the scale range where reliability was estimated at or above person separation index 0.7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability was assessed by a test information function (TIF) curve and reporting the proportions of respondents located within the scale range where reliability was estimated at or above person separation index 0.7. No point estimate of reliability is reported, since it is more relevant to report the TIF, as it is based on item properties rather than sample properties (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summarily, when one factor accounts for the test performance of a student in a test is referred to as a uni-dimensional model. Also, Models in which it is assumed that more than one trait is required to account for student test performance are referred to as multidimensional [13].…”
Section: Dimensionality Assumption Of Irtmentioning
confidence: 99%