Validação de Instrumento de Avaliação de Disciplinas de Escola Médica no Brasil

Icaza, Edgar Enrique Sarria; Antonello, Ivan Carlos Ferreira; Mattiello, Rita; Salerno, Margareth Rodrigues; Lopes, Maria Helena Itaqui

doi:10.1590/1981-52712015v40n4e01702015

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the value obtained was still below ideal, which reinforces the need for more changes in the instrument studied. It is worth mentioning that, even if an instrument is considered valid and reliable, it can still be improved in future studies, since there are no definitive and perfect instruments, especially when it comes to educational evaluation (11) .…”

Section: Q10mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Knowledge of the care of wounded patients: evidence of validity of an instrument

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: to present evidence of validity of an instrument aimed at evaluating the knowledge of nursing students about the care of the wounded patient, according to the difficulty and discrimination indexes of the items. Method: methodological study conducted in a nursing higher education institution with 117 undergraduate students and 38 professionals from a research group with experience in the area of wounds. For data collection, a questionnaire with 10 multiple choice questions was applied before and after classes on wounds. Results: most of the questions presented low level of difficulty and inefficient discrimination index, requiring a revision of the instrument. After two review stages, the difficulty and discrimination indexes of the instruments improved. Conclusion: an instrument with better evidence of validity was obtained. However, it still requires refinement for later revalidation in the same population.

show abstract

Section: Q10mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To evaluate this knowledge, the instruments used must be reliable, based on scientific evidence, objective, valid and reflect various achievement levels (11)(12) . An instrument is valid when its construction and applicability allow a true measurement of what they are intended to measure (13) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge of the care of wounded patients: evidence of validity of an instrument

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are several aspects that can be analyzed that, according to the literature, directly correlate with student satisfaction regarding the course. Among them are the assessment of the infrastructure of teaching spaces and supervised medical practice, through the performance of the faculty (teaching strategies, didactics, pedagogical planning, interaction with students, among others) to the assessment of the administrative units of student support 4 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional evaluation methods that include perspectives of Medical school students: a scoping systematic review

Jesuino,

Leite,

Cordeiro

et al. 2024

Rev. bras. educ. med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Institutional evaluation is an important tool for the constant improvement of medical courses, especially when they take the student’s opinion as one of their focuses. Objective: The main objective of this study is to investigate which methods are used to conduct institutional evaluations involving student opinion through a scoping systematic review. Methodology: In compliance with the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR)”, the searches were conducted in a standardized form, involving at least two researchers and consulting the Lilacs, Scielo, Pubmed, and Embase databases and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), using the software Rayyan, to signal duplicates and allow an independent and unbiased evaluation by the two reviewers. The inclusion criteria used were: Studies published between 2009 and 2019, containing the methodology of evaluation, which assessed medical courses and in which this evaluation was carried out by students at some stage. Also, the following exclusion criteria were used: studies written in languages other than Portuguese, English, French and Spanish; evaluations of a specific pedagogical intervention or limited to some subjects; and articles focusing on student self-assessment. The restriction of time and languages carries the risk of selection bias. Results: 2355 records were found and 12 articles were included. Most studies created their questionnaire and used mostly quantitative scales, although many also included some type of qualitative analysis with written questions. Most of the studies dealt with an occasional analysis and not with a project of permanent evaluation of the institution. Conclusion: Publications in the field of institutional evaluation that involve students and describe the questionnaire are still rare, especially when related to permanent evaluations.

show abstract

Validação de Instrumento de Avaliação de Disciplinas de Escola Médica no Brasil

Abstract: PALAVRAS-CHAVE

Cited by 2 publications

References 20 publications

Knowledge of the care of wounded patients: evidence of validity of an instrument

Knowledge of the care of wounded patients: evidence of validity of an instrument

Institutional evaluation methods that include perspectives of Medical school students: a scoping systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About