Validación de la escala Sentido de Coherencia (SOC) 13-item en una muestra Peruana

Abstract

<p>El propósito del estudio fue evaluar las propiedades psicométricas de la escala SOC-13 en una muestra de 448 universitarios peruanos con edades entre 18-29 años. La confiabilidad se calculó con el coeficiente de alfa de cronbach, y se encontró un .80 para toda la escala. La estructura interna del instrumento se evaluó mediante análisis de escalamiento multidimensional y análisis factorial confirmatorio. El análisis factorial confirmatorio se estimó comparando el ajuste de dos modelos propuestos, uno uni-factorial frente a uno de primer orden con tres factores. Se encontró un buen ajuste para la solución de tres factores (RMSEA = 0.06, CFI = .92). Correlaciones entre SOC y salud mental y física fueron <em>r</em> = .59, <em>p</em> < .001 y <em>r</em> = .40, <em>p</em> < .001 respectivamente. El SOC-13 mostró propiedades psicométricas adecuadas con respecto a confiabilidad, validez de criterio y estructura factorial en esta muestra. Limitaciones se debieron a la homogeneidad en la muestra, edad y poca representatividad de la población Peruana. Estudios posteriores deberían enfocarse en analizar la estructura factorial del SOC-13 y la habilidad de cada ítem para medir adecuadamente Sentido de Coherencia en jóvenes peruanos.</p>

The Egyptian Validation Study of the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) and its Utility in Predicting Depression

“…These results were higher than those from Iranian College students in which the reliability of the personal structure subscale was low [40]. The low internal consistency of the personal structure subscale might be attributed to the number of items (5 items) instead of inadequate reliability as suggested by [39]. The findings indicated that with the exception of two resilience factors, Personal Competence (t = 3.91, p<0.01) and Family Coherence (t = 3.39, p<0.01), (Total RSA, t = 3.91, p < .01), the rest of the RSA factors were insignificant predictors of depression (Social Competence, t = .669 p = n.s.…”

“…In a review of more than 42 different studies in 14 different languages, the SOC was found to have different factor structures concluding that the one-factor structure was the fit and appropriate one. In contrast, Saravia, Iberico, & Yearwood [39] found that that a three factor solution was a better model fit for the Peruvian sample. Nevertheless, certain items did not perform properly and accurately.…”

“…It is possible to use the total score of the scale. Concerning reliability, the Cronbach´s alpha for an overall score was 0.80 [39]. The SOC has adequate construct, content and criterion validity [36].…”

The Reliability and Predictive Validity of Sense of Coherence Scale for American Survivors of Gender-Based Violence

“…The SOC construct and the SOC-13 scale have been linked to health outcomes in research on most continents, including various cultures, including Western, Asia, and Africa, in diverse samples (Dudek & Koniarek, 2000; Eriksson & Mittelmark, 2017; Erim et al, 2011; Evans & Davis, 2018; Koelen et al, 2017; Stansfeld et al, 2019). However, the SOC scale has been criticized for its inconsistent psychometric properties (Getnet & Alem, 2019; Jakobsson, 2011; Saravia et al, 2014; Sardu et al, 2012). These criticisms have focused on low internal consistency for the subscales and low regression weights for particular items.…”

Estilo de vida promotor de salud y sentido de coherencia en adultos jóvenes universitarios

“…Valora las dimensiones comprensibilidad (COMP), manejabilidad (MANEJ) y significatividad (SIGN), (25,26). El resultado permite calcular la puntuación media de cada dimensión y puntuación media global para obtener el SOC, una puntuación global superior a la media indica SOC alto.…”