Validación de la versión en español del Cuestionario de Tos Leicester en niños con fibrosis quística

Corral, Tamara del; Percegona, Janaína; López, N. Pérez y; Valiente, Andrea; Garriga, M.; Seborga, Melisa; Vilaró, Jordi

doi:10.1016/j.arbres.2015.01.016

Cited by 5 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results obtained in the present study are similar to those obtained in the preliminary study with the English version of the LCQ at a single CF adult centre 12 and those obtained in a multicentre study with another Spanish version in a CF paediatric population. 17 However, there are some differences from the current study. Neither of the two studies included a calculation of the sample size and fewer patients were included.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 62%

“…The populations studied had better pulmonary function, which may explain why they found a ceiling effect in the psychological and social domains of the LCQ in the adult study 12 and in all the domains in the paediatric study. 17 The results for internal consistency were lower in the paediatric population probably because of the lower age of the patients. 17 The time to analyse test–retest reliability was 1 week after completing the initial questionnaire in the adult study, 12 and between 15 and 30 days afterwards in the paediatric study, where only levels >0.70 of ICC were achieved in the total LCQ score.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“… 17 The results for internal consistency were lower in the paediatric population probably because of the lower age of the patients. 17 The time to analyse test–retest reliability was 1 week after completing the initial questionnaire in the adult study, 12 and between 15 and 30 days afterwards in the paediatric study, where only levels >0.70 of ICC were achieved in the total LCQ score. 17 Concurrent validity was assessed in both studies with the CFQ-revised showing moderate correlations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…It was designed for chronic cough and although it had not been validated in CF patients at the time, it was used as a primary outcome measure with gastroesophageal reflux surgery in CF. 16 More recently, the LCQ has appeared to be valid, reliable and responsive after an exacerbation in CF adults in a preliminary study 12 and a Spanish version has also been found to be reliable in CF children, 17 although neither study included a calculation of the sample size and both had less than 60 patients.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Validation of a Spanish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in cystic fibrosis

Muñoz¹,

Gracia

Girón

et al. 2021

Chron Respir Dis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cough is a main symptom in cystic fibrosis (CF). We aim to validate a Spanish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ-Sp) to measure the impact of cough in CF bronchiectasis. A prospective longitudinal multicentre study was performed. Internal consistency and score changes over a 15-day period in stable state were assessed to analyse reliability. Concurrent validity was analysed by correlation with Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and convergent validity by assessing the association with clinical variables. Changes in scores between stable state and the first exacerbation were assessed to analyse responsiveness. 132 patients (29.73 ± 10.52 years) were enrolled in four hospitals. Internal consistency was high for the total score and good for the three domains (Cronbach’s α 0.81–0.93). The test–retest reliability showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86 for the total score. The correlation between LCQ-Sp and SGRQ scores was −0.74. The LCQ-Sp score negatively correlated with sputum volume, and the mean score decreased at the beginning of exacerbations (16.04±3.81 vs 13.91±4.29) with a large effect size. The LCQ-Sp is a reliable, repeatable and responsive instrument to assess the impact of cough in CF bronchiectasis and is responsive to change in the event of exacerbations.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 62%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Validation of a Spanish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in cystic fibrosis

Muñoz¹,

Gracia

Girón

et al. 2021

Chron Respir Dis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The LCQ has been translated into several languages including Dutch, Korean, Lithuanian, Mandarin, Polish, Portuguese and Spanish, and validated in corresponding cohorts[ 13 – 22 ]. It has been validated in different diseases, like chronic cough itself, cystic fibrosis including in children, bronchiectasis and COPD, yet not in a sarcoidosis cohort[ 20 , 23 – 25 ]. Furthermore, a revised version, the LCQ-acute, was developed for patients with acute cough[ 26 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of the German version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in sarcoidosis

Schupp¹,

Fichtner²,

Frye³

et al. 2018

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundCough is one of the most common symptoms in general and pulmonary medicine with profound negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL). The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a validated HRQL questionnaire, yet a validated German version of the LCQ is not available and it has never been tested in a cohort with sarcoidosis.ObjectivesTo translate the LCQ into German and determine its psychometric properties.MethodsThe LCQ was translated in a forward-backward approach. Structured interviews in sarcoidosis patients were performed. Subsequently, sarcoidosis patients were asked to answer the German LCQ and comparative questionnaires. Distribution properties, item difficulty, concurrent validity, Rasch model fit and internal consistency of the German LCQ were determined.Results200 patients with sarcoidosis were included. We provide evidence for reliability, unidimensionality and internal consistency. However, only a moderate correlation with general and respiratory-specific HRQL questionnaires, no Rasch model fit could be shown. Skewed responses caused by floor effects were detected.ConclusionWe demonstrate that the German LCQ is valid and reliable and its psychometric properties fulfil the standards required for its use in clinical settings as well as in interventional trials.

show abstract

Spanish adaptation and validation of the child‐ and parent‐report cystic fibrosis questionnaire‐revised (CFQ‐R)

Blanco‐Orive,

del Corral,

Martín‐Casas

et al. 2023

Pediatric Pulmonology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish versions of the child‐ and parent‐report cystic fibrosis questionnaire‐revised (CFQ‐R).MethodsA Spanish adaptation of the CFQ‐R was performed; 68 children with CF (6−13 years) and their parents completed the child‐ and parent‐report CFQ‐R, respectively, and the Revidierter KINDer Lebensqualitätsfragebogen (KINDL) questionnaire. The CFQ‐R was completed twice, 7−10 days apart, and its psychometric properties were analyzed.ResultsThe internal consistency of both CFQ‐R versions was adequate (child‐report version, Cronbach's α >.60 for all domains except “Treatment Burden” [α = .42] and “Social Functioning” [α = .57]; parent‐report version, α > .60 for all domains except “Social Functioning” [α = .58]). For the child‐report version, the lowest measurement error was for “Emotional Functioning” (standard error of measurement [SEM]: 8.3%; minimal detectable change [MDC90]: 19.3%), and the highest was for “Body Image” (SEM: 15%; MDC90: 35%). For the parent‐report version, the lowest measurement error was for “Physical Functioning” (SEM: 7.1%; MDC90: 16.5%), and the highest was for “Weight” (SEM: 17.2%; MDC90; 40.1%). The correlation between the versions showed higher agreement for the domains related to observable signs (“Physical Functioning”) and lower agreement for “Emotional Functioning.” There was a significant correlation between the CFQ‐R and KINDL.ConclusionBoth the child‐ and parent‐report versions of the Spanish CFQ‐R have adequate reliability and validity for clinical and research purposes. These versions can be administered before and after starting modulator therapy to assess its effect on daily functioning. The MDC90 can help identify, with a high probability, whether real changes have occurred in the quality‐of‐life subscales in children with CF.

show abstract

Validación de la versión en español del Cuestionario de Tos Leicester en niños con fibrosis quística

Cited by 5 publications

References 34 publications

Validation of a Spanish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in cystic fibrosis

Validation of a Spanish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in cystic fibrosis

Psychometric properties of the German version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in sarcoidosis

Spanish adaptation and validation of the child‐ and parent‐report cystic fibrosis questionnaire‐revised (CFQ‐R)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About