Validación de un cuestionario para evaluar la calidad asistencial en Podología

Coheña‐Jiménez, Manuel; Galván, José Ramos; Durán, Ramón Mahillo

doi:10.5209/rev_ricp.2013.v7.n2.41741

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is used to determine the validity of the content of an instrument; the degree to which a test appropriately represents what has been carried out [15,16]. This type of validation has been widely used in the scientific literature to validate questionnaires in different areas [11,12,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and Validation of the Overall Foot Health Questionnaire for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Analysis

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objectives: In general, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are ignorant of the physician’s role and of RA-related feet problems. The aim of our study was to validate a questionnaire on the knowledge of different aspects of overall foot health in patients with RA. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive analysis was carried out between March 2017 and April 2017. A questionnaire was designed and validated through the Delphi method to evaluate the knowledge about the illness, the repercussions on feet, medical podiatry care, and the role of the medical podiatrist. Results: After being checked by a panel of experts, all the items obtained a Cronbach’s alpha over 0.70. Conclusions: The content of this questionnaire about the knowledge of different aspects of medical podiatry health in patients with RA has internal consistency.

show abstract