2015
DOI: 10.5546/aap.2015.221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validación del índice pediátrico de mortalidad 2 (PIM2) en Argentina: un estudio prospectivo, multicéntrico, observacional

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, more than half our PICU patients did not require mechanical ventilation, even in the unplanned admission group (43%), which is similar to that reported in previous studies, including a large multicenter cohort in Latin America (48-53%%) ( 13 , 20 ) We interpret this as a marker of proactive identification of deterioration events and timely PICU transfer of patients with critical illness. While it may be argued that some of these admissions do not actually experience critical illness, our expected mortality is similar to that of a large Argentinian cohort ( 25 ). Similarly, our observed mortality and performance (observed/expected mortality) in the unplanned admissions, mechanical ventilation and RRT subgroups is comparable to that of high-resource settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Notably, more than half our PICU patients did not require mechanical ventilation, even in the unplanned admission group (43%), which is similar to that reported in previous studies, including a large multicenter cohort in Latin America (48-53%%) ( 13 , 20 ) We interpret this as a marker of proactive identification of deterioration events and timely PICU transfer of patients with critical illness. While it may be argued that some of these admissions do not actually experience critical illness, our expected mortality is similar to that of a large Argentinian cohort ( 25 ). Similarly, our observed mortality and performance (observed/expected mortality) in the unplanned admissions, mechanical ventilation and RRT subgroups is comparable to that of high-resource settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…They generally showed good discrimination but poor calibration. In these studies, PIM2 tended to underestimate mortality ( 29 , 31 , 33 , 34 ) but overestimated in one ( 30 ). PIM3 also had good discrimination but poor calibration ( 13 , 14 , 36 , 37 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2) is a widely used prognostic score that has been properly validated in the pediatric population. 3 , 4 By means of ten clinical and laboratory variables, PIM2 provides a percentage result that indicates the probability of death. Other laboratory tests that are not part of the PIM2 formula have also been studied as prognostic biomarkers, whether alone or in combination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%