2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2017.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validación del KDRI/KPDI para la selección de donantes renales con criterios expandidos

Abstract: 1) KPDI and histological scores show moderate concordance. The utility of both scores as combined tools it has to be determined. 2) KDPI score, and especially KDRI score, are valid for estimating graft survival and combined with the biopsy can help to individualized decision making in the expanded criteria donors pool.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The KDRI has already been validated in the Dutch population 28 . In Spain, the KDPI and KDRI were validated for ECDs 29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KDRI has already been validated in the Dutch population 28 . In Spain, the KDPI and KDRI were validated for ECDs 29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the KDRI better represented DGF than KDPI in KT from DDs �60 years. A previous report indicated that the KDRI was better than the KDPI in estimating graft survival [18]. The KDPI is a relative mapping of the KDRI.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a Spanish study validated the usefulness of the KDRI in a European population[77]. The study evaluated 144 renal transplants.…”
Section: Ecd-kdri-kdpimentioning
confidence: 99%