2000
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-44462000000400006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validade e confiabilidade da versão brasileira de um inventário de avaliação de relações objetais<A NAME="top"></A>

Abstract: Introdução: Relação objetal tem sido um conceito fértil para a psicanálise e para a psiquiatria. O reconhecimento crescente do valor diagnóstico do conceito de relação objetal nos transtornos psiquiátricos tem levado ao desenvolvimento de várias escalas que pretendem mensurá-lo. O estudo teve o propósito de produzir os índices de validade e confiabilidade da versão em português de um instrumento amplamente usado, planejado para avaliar relações objetais, o Bell Object Relations and Reality Testing Inventory (B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Test-retest reliability measures the degree to which an individual's score remains stable over time (Marx, Menezes, Horovitz, Jones, & Warren, 2003;Bruscato & Iacoponi, 2000). Despite the fact that our results were obtained only from individuals with BMI > 24.5, the coefficients of the present validation demonstrate a strong correlation between the scores of each item and the total score on the two occasions on which the questionnaire was administered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Test-retest reliability measures the degree to which an individual's score remains stable over time (Marx, Menezes, Horovitz, Jones, & Warren, 2003;Bruscato & Iacoponi, 2000). Despite the fact that our results were obtained only from individuals with BMI > 24.5, the coefficients of the present validation demonstrate a strong correlation between the scores of each item and the total score on the two occasions on which the questionnaire was administered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…No entanto, existe uma lacuna nas pesquisas educacionais brasileiras, pois estratégias de verifi cação do nível de confi abilidade e concordância entre juízes têm sido pouco estudadas e aplicadas no campo educacional. Essa, porém, parece ser uma realidade diferente da área de ciências da saúde no Brasil, em que se verifi ca uma maior aplicação das téc-nicas de confi abilidade e concordância entre juízes (ANDRADE; SHIRAKAWA, 2006;BRUSCATO;IACOPONI, 2000;DEL-BEN et al, 2001;FRAGA-MAIA;SANTANA, 2005;PERROCA;GAIDZINSKI, 2002GAIDZINSKI, , 2003POLANCZYK et al, 2003;VENTURA;BOTTINO, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The subscales show good correlation scores when compared to their respective dimensions in the English version (0.62 for alienation, 0.82 for insecure attachment, 0.83 for egocentricity and 0.78 for social incompetence). Reliability scores are also acceptable with Cronbach's alpha for all items at 0.59, and split-half Spearman-Brown at 0.63 [41].…”
Section: Object Relationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Object relations were assessed using the Bell Object Relations and Reality Testing Inventory-Form O (BORR-TI-O) translated and validated in Brazilian Portuguese [41]. The BORRTI-O is a 45-item, self-report inventory that asks respondents to rate each statement as true or false, based on their most recent experience.…”
Section: Object Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%