2022
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validated 5 – Point photonumeric scales for the assessment of hand atrophy

Abstract: Objective: Quantifying the degree of dorsal hand atrophy is a challenging endeavor, but often necessary, in both the clinical and the research setting. The aim of this investigation was to create and consecutively validate a 5-point photonumeric scale for assessment of dorsal hand atrophy. Material and Methods:A medical team created a novel 5-point photonumeric scale.Twelve international raters were involved in the digital validation, while five raters performed a live validation. Results:For the digital valid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although scales classically originate from the clinical study setting, have been the only tool to measure efficacy in aesthetic medicine for a long time, and are still considered the gold standard, the use of scales has also gained popularity in the clinical setting. [13][14][15] By showing a patient his initial forehead line severity upon rest (static) and eye-brow elevation (dynamic) a physician can properly discuss the possibilities and the anticipated outcome of a treatment with the patient, which facilitates communication overall. At the same time, it is a useful tool to manage expectations with the patient, as very severe static forehead lines will not become mild static forehead lines with the use of botulinum toxin within a time frame of a couple of weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although scales classically originate from the clinical study setting, have been the only tool to measure efficacy in aesthetic medicine for a long time, and are still considered the gold standard, the use of scales has also gained popularity in the clinical setting. [13][14][15] By showing a patient his initial forehead line severity upon rest (static) and eye-brow elevation (dynamic) a physician can properly discuss the possibilities and the anticipated outcome of a treatment with the patient, which facilitates communication overall. At the same time, it is a useful tool to manage expectations with the patient, as very severe static forehead lines will not become mild static forehead lines with the use of botulinum toxin within a time frame of a couple of weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The creation and validation of the Croma Static Forehead Lines-Assessment Scale and the Croma Dynamic Forehead Lines-Assessment Scale were performed according to a previously published protocol. [13][14][15]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%