2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10493-020-00565-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating a common tick survey method: cloth-dragging and line transects

Abstract: Cloth-dragging is the most widely-used method for collecting and counting ticks, but there are few studies of its reliability. By using cloth-dragging, we applied a replicated line transects survey method, in two areas in Sweden with different Ixodes ricinus tick-densities (low at Grimsö and high at Bogesund) to evaluate developmental stage specific repeatability, agreement and precision in estimates of tick abundance. ‘Repeatability’ was expressed as the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), ‘agreement’ w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of adult ticks ( n = 29) represented 9.2% of our overall collection which was much lower than the number of nymphs collected ( n = 315). This is in line with other studies that have employed a dragging protocol to collect questing ticks [ 78 , 79 , 80 ]. We chose to study I. ricinus nymphs only for three main reasons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The number of adult ticks ( n = 29) represented 9.2% of our overall collection which was much lower than the number of nymphs collected ( n = 315). This is in line with other studies that have employed a dragging protocol to collect questing ticks [ 78 , 79 , 80 ]. We chose to study I. ricinus nymphs only for three main reasons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, other research has found that data produced using different tick sampling methods is similar ( Rulison et al, 2013 ). Yet even more recent research attempting to validate dragging with other tick species in Sweden concluded that dragging was not recommended for tick adults or larvae, due to low repeatability and agreement ( Kjellander et al, 2021 ). This may be due to the lack of standardization within dragging cloths or other within-method variability between surveys ( Newman et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study attempted to explore the baseline abundance, seasonal, and interannual variations of I. ricinus nymph activity by expanding the observation across a wide range of geographical/climatic areas over a long period, involving a total of 11 sampling sites from 7 tick observatories in France over 8 years. With the repeated removal sampling design, we controlled the uncertainty on the proxy measure of tick abundance (nymph counts per 100 m 2 ) that arises from the variability of sampling rate across different sites and times 24,49 . Furthermore, all transects were covered with low vegetations, which were shown to maximize sampling rates compared to other types of vegetative oors 24 , resulting in higher accuracy in estimating the proxy of tick abundance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%